<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
		<modsCollection
		    xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
		    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
		    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3"
		    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-5.xsd">
		<mods version="3.5">
		    <titleInfo>
				<title>Euthanasia from Christian and Islamic point of view</title>
			</titleInfo>
				<name type="personal">
				<namePart type="family">Sayyed Hasan</namePart>
				<namePart type="given">Eslami</namePart>
				<affiliation>استادیار مؤسسه آموزش عالی ادیان و مذاهب</affiliation>
				<role>
				<roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator">author</roleTerm>
				</role>
			</name>
			<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
			<genre>article</genre>
			<originInfo>
				<dateIssued keyDate="yes" encoding="w3cdtf">2006</dateIssued>
			</originInfo>
			<language>
				<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">per</languageTerm>
			</language>
			<abstract>n this paper, the author tries to deal with one of the most important contemporary ethical problems, i.e. euthanasia. Is it moral and ethically justifiable to kill a terminally ill person on his or her request due to an endless pain and suffering or incurable disease? To answer the question, the paper is divided into five sections. In the first section, euthanasia and its various kinds are defined, and the scope of the paper is limited accurately. The second section introduces catholic teachings and its uncompromising position against this action. The third section introduces Islamic viewpoint on euthanasia. Based on the Quranic verses, killing an innocent person is the gravest crime and is against God’s written law. The forth section concentrates on the two fundamental arguments in favor of euthanasia: the first is self-determination and respect for human autonomy, and the second is compassion and kindness to the patient with incurable disease. The fifth section assesses these reasons and tries to show that they are misused.
 </abstract>
			<relatedItem type="host">
			<titleInfo>
				<title>Journal of Philosophical Theological Research</title>
			</titleInfo>
			<originInfo>
				<publisher>University of Qom</publisher>
			</originInfo>
			<identifier type="issn">1735-9791</identifier>
			<part>
				<detail type="volume">
					<number>8</number>
					<caption>v.</caption>
				</detail>
				<detail type="issue">
				<number>1</number>
				<caption>no.</caption>
				</detail>
				<text type="year">2006</text>
				<extent unit="pages">
					<start>31</start>
					<end>52</end>
				</extent>
			</part>
			</relatedItem>
			<identifier type="uri">http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_275_5c0e175c17aca648daa762421b757c43.pdf</identifier>
			<identifier type="doi">dx.doi.org/10.22091/pfk.2006.275</identifier>
			</mods>
		<mods version="3.5">
		    <titleInfo>
				<title>Ibn Sina’s Innovations in (Philosophical) Psychology</title>
			</titleInfo>
				<name type="personal">
				<namePart type="family">Sayyed Mohammad Ali</namePart>
				<namePart type="given">Dibāji</namePart>
				<affiliation>استادیار دانشگاه تهران</affiliation>
				<role>
				<roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator">author</roleTerm>
				</role>
			</name>
			<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
			<genre>article</genre>
			<originInfo>
				<dateIssued keyDate="yes" encoding="w3cdtf">2006</dateIssued>
			</originInfo>
			<language>
				<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">per</languageTerm>
			</language>
			<abstract> 





A





ristotle, Regarded as the founder of psychology (study of the soul), understood substances as matter organized by a particular form. The soul, for Aristotle, is the form of the body. Yet, in his view, motion, nourishing, imagination and reasoning, are among the acts of the soul, which make it different from other forms. Studying psychology deeply in the light of the Kalam and Islamic philosophy, Ibn Sina raised a number of questions: Is reasoning corporeal or incorporeal? Is the soul enduring or mortal? And what is the relationship between the soul and body? Contrary to Aristotle, Ibn Sina held that the soul is not corporeal, mortal and impressed in body but it is incorporeal, enduring, and regulator of body. Innovating new methods and solutions for topics such as the existence of the soul, nature of minds, sensory perceptions, inner sense, intellectual faculties, interaction between the soul and body, relationship between active intellect and human intelligence, and many other questions, Ibn Sina also attempted to study the soul separately and free from the methodology of physics, and in fact, to establish study of the soul on foundations different from Aristotle view.
 </abstract>
			<relatedItem type="host">
			<titleInfo>
				<title>Journal of Philosophical Theological Research</title>
			</titleInfo>
			<originInfo>
				<publisher>University of Qom</publisher>
			</originInfo>
			<identifier type="issn">1735-9791</identifier>
			<part>
				<detail type="volume">
					<number>8</number>
					<caption>v.</caption>
				</detail>
				<detail type="issue">
				<number>1</number>
				<caption>no.</caption>
				</detail>
				<text type="year">2006</text>
				<extent unit="pages">
					<start>53</start>
					<end>89</end>
				</extent>
			</part>
			</relatedItem>
			<identifier type="uri">http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_276_dadf11e0cd6082648d90a23374447659.pdf</identifier>
			<identifier type="doi">dx.doi.org/10.22091/pfk.2006.276</identifier>
			</mods>
		<mods version="3.5">
		    <titleInfo>
				<title>Relationship between Truth and Justice</title>
			</titleInfo>
				<name type="personal">
				<namePart type="family">Hosein</namePart>
				<namePart type="given">Tavasoli</namePart>
				<affiliation>استادیار دانشگاه باقرالعلوم</affiliation>
				<role>
				<roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator">author</roleTerm>
				</role>
			</name>
			<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
			<genre>article</genre>
			<originInfo>
				<dateIssued keyDate="yes" encoding="w3cdtf">2006</dateIssued>
			</originInfo>
			<language>
				<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">per</languageTerm>
			</language>
			<abstract> 





Q





uestion of relationship between truth and justice can give a proper chance to representing some of the most important disputed concepts in respect to basic political values such as justice, equality, and human rights. Since there are some differences in basic principle as well as in methodology, it is necessary to examine the correlation of truth with justice in different epistemic levels or layers. The present essay attempts to embark on such a study by mentioning some more important examples, so that to provide an entrance to the nowadays settings of the discussion for Persian-speaking readers.
 </abstract>
			<relatedItem type="host">
			<titleInfo>
				<title>Journal of Philosophical Theological Research</title>
			</titleInfo>
			<originInfo>
				<publisher>University of Qom</publisher>
			</originInfo>
			<identifier type="issn">1735-9791</identifier>
			<part>
				<detail type="volume">
					<number>8</number>
					<caption>v.</caption>
				</detail>
				<detail type="issue">
				<number>1</number>
				<caption>no.</caption>
				</detail>
				<text type="year">2006</text>
				<extent unit="pages">
					<start>91</start>
					<end>109</end>
				</extent>
			</part>
			</relatedItem>
			<identifier type="uri">http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_277_9067d59ac6054d6f2d193735ebe3268e.pdf</identifier>
			<identifier type="doi">dx.doi.org/10.22091/pfk.2006.277</identifier>
			</mods>
		<mods version="3.5">
		    <titleInfo>
				<title>Causal Relation in Mystical determinism of Rumi</title>
			</titleInfo>
				<name type="personal">
				<namePart type="family">Muhammad</namePart>
				<namePart type="given">Foladi</namePart>
				<affiliation>عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه قم</affiliation>
				<role>
				<roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator">author</roleTerm>
				</role>
			</name>
				<name type="personal">
				<namePart type="family">Muhammad Reza</namePart>
				<namePart type="given">Yosefi</namePart>
				<affiliation>عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه قم</affiliation>
				<role>
				<roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator">author</roleTerm>
				</role>
			</name>
			<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
			<genre>article</genre>
			<originInfo>
				<dateIssued keyDate="yes" encoding="w3cdtf">2006</dateIssued>
			</originInfo>
			<language>
				<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">per</languageTerm>
			</language>
			<abstract>C





ompulsion and choice are one of the significant issues of theology; and from a long time ago, it has been paid attention to with different viewpoints; each of the followers of  the different beliefs has dealt with this issue according to his own specific idea. One of the famous viewpoints in this regard is that of the mystics, which has a widespread reflection in the literal-mystical heritage. Mowlavi, as one of the theoreticians of this issue, deals with it in Mathnavi Ma’navi through anecdotes and proverbs, which is the Quranic method. In this article, the background of the theological discussions and its effect on the Iranian’s culture and thoughts, as well as on Mowlavi’s mystical viewpoints, are investigated.
He poses such issues as cause and signification, providing causes and removing them, the relationship between compulsion and trust to show that Allah’s specific compulsion is the sign of man’s weakness and finally of the compulsion. With reference to the man’s regret and shame for what he has done, he also introduces man as a creature with a conscious choice.
 </abstract>
			<relatedItem type="host">
			<titleInfo>
				<title>Journal of Philosophical Theological Research</title>
			</titleInfo>
			<originInfo>
				<publisher>University of Qom</publisher>
			</originInfo>
			<identifier type="issn">1735-9791</identifier>
			<part>
				<detail type="volume">
					<number>8</number>
					<caption>v.</caption>
				</detail>
				<detail type="issue">
				<number>1</number>
				<caption>no.</caption>
				</detail>
				<text type="year">2006</text>
				<extent unit="pages">
					<start>111</start>
					<end>134</end>
				</extent>
			</part>
			</relatedItem>
			<identifier type="uri">http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_278_07ed4e841c7ddc83f02e14f247467d36.pdf</identifier>
			<identifier type="doi">dx.doi.org/10.22091/pfk.2006.278</identifier>
			</mods>
		<mods version="3.5">
		    <titleInfo>
				<title>Comparative Typology of Motahari’s and Ashtiani’s Approaches to Western Philosophy</title>
			</titleInfo>
				<name type="personal">
				<namePart type="family">Hosein Ali</namePart>
				<namePart type="given">Rahmati</namePart>
				<affiliation>پژوهشگر علم فلسفه، دانشگاه مفید</affiliation>
				<role>
				<roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator">author</roleTerm>
				</role>
			</name>
			<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
			<genre>article</genre>
			<originInfo>
				<dateIssued keyDate="yes" encoding="w3cdtf">2006</dateIssued>
			</originInfo>
			<language>
				<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">per</languageTerm>
			</language>
			<abstract>ranians have been familiar with new western philosophies for more than one century. One of the main subjects which today should be seriously dealt with is typology of Iranian thinkers’ approaches to those philosophies. The author of this paper holds that Sayyed Jalāl `d-din Ashtiani and Morteza Motahari can be studied as representative of two different approaches to western philosophy. According to the author’s claim, Motahari’s approach is more plausible, more useful and more practical. Presenting some introductory points, the present article examines these two thinkers’ viewpoints of western philosophy in a comparative way; then, it explains why Mortahari’s approach is better, though possessing shortcomings.
 </abstract>
			<relatedItem type="host">
			<titleInfo>
				<title>Journal of Philosophical Theological Research</title>
			</titleInfo>
			<originInfo>
				<publisher>University of Qom</publisher>
			</originInfo>
			<identifier type="issn">1735-9791</identifier>
			<part>
				<detail type="volume">
					<number>8</number>
					<caption>v.</caption>
				</detail>
				<detail type="issue">
				<number>1</number>
				<caption>no.</caption>
				</detail>
				<text type="year">2006</text>
				<extent unit="pages">
					<start>135</start>
					<end>161</end>
				</extent>
			</part>
			</relatedItem>
			<identifier type="uri">http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_279_c66b759c8bf21556aa694593ff3e19e8.pdf</identifier>
			<identifier type="doi">dx.doi.org/10.22091/pfk.2006.279</identifier>
			</mods>
		<mods version="3.5">
		    <titleInfo>
				<title>Scheme of Tajalli (Theophany)</title>
			</titleInfo>
				<name type="personal">
				<namePart type="family">Sayyed Ahmad</namePart>
				<namePart type="given">Fāzeli</namePart>
				<affiliation>دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه قم</affiliation>
				<role>
				<roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator">author</roleTerm>
				</role>
			</name>
			<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
			<genre>article</genre>
			<originInfo>
				<dateIssued keyDate="yes" encoding="w3cdtf">2006</dateIssued>
			</originInfo>
			<language>
				<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">per</languageTerm>
			</language>
			<abstract>A





mong the questions of fundamental importance in theoretical Sufism is analysis of the realm of all other than God, after oneness of Being (wahdat al-wujood). Enumerating necessary preliminaries of the discussion, this paper investigates into tajalli (theophany) as a scheme, which is put in charge of explaining and analyzing Multiplicities. What, for the author, can be of special importance is the validity of what is ascribed to mystics, especially to those following Muhyi al-Din Ibn al-‘Arabi. Meanwhile in the writings of some researchers, there are some wrong conceptions, which are decisively ascribed to Shaykh Akbar; if we are to prevent research harms, we should avoid such erroneous ascriptions and undertake to represent opinions precisely. So the author sets forth Shaykh Akbar’s and his expositor’s words in a narrator-like way and then analyzes them.
 </abstract>
			<relatedItem type="host">
			<titleInfo>
				<title>Journal of Philosophical Theological Research</title>
			</titleInfo>
			<originInfo>
				<publisher>University of Qom</publisher>
			</originInfo>
			<identifier type="issn">1735-9791</identifier>
			<part>
				<detail type="volume">
					<number>8</number>
					<caption>v.</caption>
				</detail>
				<detail type="issue">
				<number>1</number>
				<caption>no.</caption>
				</detail>
				<text type="year">2006</text>
				<extent unit="pages">
					<start>163</start>
					<end>185</end>
				</extent>
			</part>
			</relatedItem>
			<identifier type="uri">http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_280_004fe895882391a1aef1181be4e81fb6.pdf</identifier>
			<identifier type="doi">dx.doi.org/10.22091/pfk.2006.280</identifier>
			</mods>
		<mods version="3.5">
		    <titleInfo>
				<title>Critical Analysis of Ethical Egoism</title>
			</titleInfo>
				<name type="personal">
				<namePart type="family">Sayyed Mohammad</namePart>
				<namePart type="given">Hoseini Suraki</namePart>
				<affiliation>پژوiهشگرفلسفه پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی دفتر تبلیغات.</affiliation>
				<role>
				<roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator">author</roleTerm>
				</role>
			</name>
			<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
			<genre>article</genre>
			<originInfo>
				<dateIssued keyDate="yes" encoding="w3cdtf">2006</dateIssued>
			</originInfo>
			<language>
				<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">per</languageTerm>
			</language>
			<abstract> 





A





mong the ethical theories in the domain of normative ethics is ethical egoism. Presenting the kinds and versions of ethical egoism and its relationship to psychological egoism, this paper describes the structure and components of this theory, and then offers the arguments of those in favor and the opponents of the theory and criticizes the arguments of each.
 </abstract>
			<relatedItem type="host">
			<titleInfo>
				<title>Journal of Philosophical Theological Research</title>
			</titleInfo>
			<originInfo>
				<publisher>University of Qom</publisher>
			</originInfo>
			<identifier type="issn">1735-9791</identifier>
			<part>
				<detail type="volume">
					<number>8</number>
					<caption>v.</caption>
				</detail>
				<detail type="issue">
				<number>1</number>
				<caption>no.</caption>
				</detail>
				<text type="year">2006</text>
				<extent unit="pages">
					<start>187</start>
					<end>222</end>
				</extent>
			</part>
			</relatedItem>
			<identifier type="uri">http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_281_633b18d8450e408b6aa91630c4723643.pdf</identifier>
			<identifier type="doi">dx.doi.org/10.22091/pfk.2006.281</identifier>
			</mods>
		</modsCollection>