<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Philosophical Theological Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-9791</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Review of Support for the Legitimacy of Rational Novel Ways of Conduct</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Review of Support for the Legitimacy of Rational Novel Ways of Conduct</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>125</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>133</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">10</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/pfk.2014.10</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyyed Yusuf</FirstName>
					<LastName>Vasooqi Alavi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>04</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>  &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;It is clear that there is no specific reason for many newly-happened occurrences in the Quran and hadiths and a jurisprudent is obliged to return to such arguments as rational way of conduct, based on which the legal injunctions of such occurrences will be decided. Rational way of conduct will be a proof if it has been formed during infallible Imams’ presence, so that its conclusion from Holy Lawgiver’s view can be proved. However, those existing rational ways of conduct which are known as newly-happened ways of conduct will face with the problem of proving their authority. The present paper seeks to understand Lawgiver’s approval or disapproval of these ways of conduct. In this regard, it cites six proofs in the noble verses of the Quran, Sunna (way of conduct) and rational analysis. &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">  &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;It is clear that there is no specific reason for many newly-happened occurrences in the Quran and hadiths and a jurisprudent is obliged to return to such arguments as rational way of conduct, based on which the legal injunctions of such occurrences will be decided. Rational way of conduct will be a proof if it has been formed during infallible Imams’ presence, so that its conclusion from Holy Lawgiver’s view can be proved. However, those existing rational ways of conduct which are known as newly-happened ways of conduct will face with the problem of proving their authority. The present paper seeks to understand Lawgiver’s approval or disapproval of these ways of conduct. In this regard, it cites six proofs in the noble verses of the Quran, Sunna (way of conduct) and rational analysis. &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">rational way of conduct</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">newly-happened way of conduct</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Lawgiver’s approval</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">disapproval</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_10_579cb3d97b4354a7a2ebcdc53816f171.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
