<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Philosophical Theological Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-9791</Issn>
				<Volume>20</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Comparative Study between the Methods of Islamic Theology and Islamic Philosophy</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A Comparative Study between the Methods of Islamic Theology and Islamic Philosophy</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>141</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>162</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1150</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/pfk.2018.1521.1493</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sareh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Taghvāee</LastName>
<Affiliation>* Doctrate student, University of Qom</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-4537-0518</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abbās</FirstName>
					<LastName>Īzadpanāh</LastName>
<Affiliation>* Assistant professor, University of Qom (corresponding author)</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0002-2885-1475</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>  &lt;br /&gt;This article strives to explain the methods of the two sciences of Islamic Theology and Islamic Philosophy and subsequently study the methodical relation between them. These two sciences, as two independent sciences, have intersected with each other like other Islamic sciences over time; one such intersection is in terms of method. Islamic sciences (Qurʼānic exegesis, Jurisprudence, Theology, Philosophy etc.) are interconnected networks which have a great effect over each other. Regardless of the extreme views in this area, it can be said that from the beginning up until the present, there has been intersection between these two like, for example in the following areas: historical intersection, overlap in issues, methodical intersection etc. Considering the topic of this article, in analyzing the methods of these two sciences, we arrive at the conclusion that there has been a harmony and relation between theological methods which has undergone changes and evolutions from the beginning till now i.e. from the beginning of the initial polemic method and has ultimately changed into a philosophical and dialectical method, and between Islamic philosophical methods that have also undergone changes, i.e. from an absolutely rational method – in the manner of Greek Peripatetic Philosophy method – till the development of the various Islamic methods like: Peripatetic (localization of Islamic Peripatetic method), Islamic Illuminationism and Sadra&#039;s Transcendental Philosophy. &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt; </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">  &lt;br /&gt;This article strives to explain the methods of the two sciences of Islamic Theology and Islamic Philosophy and subsequently study the methodical relation between them. These two sciences, as two independent sciences, have intersected with each other like other Islamic sciences over time; one such intersection is in terms of method. Islamic sciences (Qurʼānic exegesis, Jurisprudence, Theology, Philosophy etc.) are interconnected networks which have a great effect over each other. Regardless of the extreme views in this area, it can be said that from the beginning up until the present, there has been intersection between these two like, for example in the following areas: historical intersection, overlap in issues, methodical intersection etc. Considering the topic of this article, in analyzing the methods of these two sciences, we arrive at the conclusion that there has been a harmony and relation between theological methods which has undergone changes and evolutions from the beginning till now i.e. from the beginning of the initial polemic method and has ultimately changed into a philosophical and dialectical method, and between Islamic philosophical methods that have also undergone changes, i.e. from an absolutely rational method – in the manner of Greek Peripatetic Philosophy method – till the development of the various Islamic methods like: Peripatetic (localization of Islamic Peripatetic method), Islamic Illuminationism and Sadra&#039;s Transcendental Philosophy. &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt; </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">comparison</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">method</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islamic Theology</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islamic Philosophy</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_1150_0cc337568c6e62817f9422008ef3c945.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
