<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه قم</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>پژوهش‌های فلسفی -کلامی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-9791</Issn>
				<Volume>25</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2023</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>24</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Constructive Comparative Philosophy of Religion: Translations of Christianity and Islam and
a Case Study of Ibn Tufayl and Ralph Cudworth</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Constructive Comparative Philosophy of Religion: Translations of Christianity and Islam and a Case Study of Ibn Tufayl and Ralph Cudworth</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>27</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>36</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2620</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/jptr.2023.9885.2946</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Charles</FirstName>
					<LastName>Taliaferro</LastName>
<Affiliation>Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, St. Olaf College, US</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-5729-0761</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Christophe</FirstName>
					<LastName>Porot</LastName>
<Affiliation>Visiting Scholar, Cambridge Centre for the Study of Platonism, Cambridge University, UK</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2023</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>18</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>We point out how some Christian-Muslim comparative philosophies of religion may be enhanced with certain translations or interpretations of Christianity: a modalist view of the trinity and a high Christology. While perhaps of only limited significance, we argue in more detail that a comparison of two leading philosophers, one Islamic, the other Christian, can bring to light a shared philosophy of innate ideas or nativism, grounding moral and theological views of goodness and the divine</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">We point out how some Christian-Muslim comparative philosophies of religion may be enhanced with certain translations or interpretations of Christianity: a modalist view of the trinity and a high Christology. While perhaps of only limited significance, we argue in more detail that a comparison of two leading philosophers, one Islamic, the other Christian, can bring to light a shared philosophy of innate ideas or nativism, grounding moral and theological views of goodness and the divine</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">monotheism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Trinity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Incarnation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ibn Tufayl</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ralph Cudworth</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Innate ideas</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">goodness</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Plato</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_2620_b25391c0c4d20e11da7e12a8b90014ea.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
