<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Philosophical Theological Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-9791</Issn>
				<Volume>7</Volume>
				<Issue>26</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2005</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Discussion of the Principality of Existence:
Confusion of Epistemology and Ontology</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Discussion of the Principality of Existence:
Confusion of Epistemology and Ontology</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>4</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>18</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">299</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/pfk.2005.299</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ahmad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ahmadi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In the arduous discussion of the principality  of existence (asālat al-wujūd) or the principality of essence (asālat al-māhiyya), it is necessary first to examine the proposition which is the cornerstone of this discussion; second, it should be discussed how its conception can cause its acknowledgement; then we can clarify the significance of existential proposition; and finally, setting forth the meanings of the  word “existence” and those of the  word “essence” or “quiddity”, it would appear the signs of confused discussion of epistemology and ontology.

 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In the arduous discussion of the principality  of existence (asālat al-wujūd) or the principality of essence (asālat al-māhiyya), it is necessary first to examine the proposition which is the cornerstone of this discussion; second, it should be discussed how its conception can cause its acknowledgement; then we can clarify the significance of existential proposition; and finally, setting forth the meanings of the  word “existence” and those of the  word “essence” or “quiddity”, it would appear the signs of confused discussion of epistemology and ontology.

 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">existence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">essence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">principality of existence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">principality of essence</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_299_ca42853fca31e7cd691bf9d8ef745293.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
