<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Philosophical Theological Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-9791</Issn>
				<Volume>16</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Review and Evaluation of Schleiermacher's View about the Nature of Mystical Experience and Knowledge</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Review and Evaluation of Schleiermacher&#039;s View about the Nature of Mystical Experience and Knowledge</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>7</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>28</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">36</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/pfk.2015.36</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mas&amp;#039;ood</FirstName>
					<LastName>Isma&amp;#039;ili</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of department of philosophy, Research Center of Islamic culture and thought</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-2076-6559</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohsen</FirstName>
					<LastName>Javadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor of philosophy, Qom University</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-4537-0518</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>16</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Schleiermacher is the founder of a trend whose members regard mystical experience as a kind of feelings and affections. Of course, he believes that this kind of experience is not devoid of any epistemic aspect and, differentiating between two kinds of feelings and two kinds of awareness, holds that mystical experience is a kind of feelings which has a direct awareness in which the distance between perceiver and perceived is removed. He uses the concept of &quot;absolute dependency&quot; to explain this particular feeling and awareness which form the nature of mystical experience and knowledge. Absolute dependency is a one-directional relationship in which man has no freedom and choice by himself. This feeling includes and explains the concept of God, world and man. Man and world are the absolute dependent and God as the other side of this dependency (Absolute Independent). Several criticisms have directed against this view, including doubt about (gradation in) the possibility of realization of non-conceptual awareness, doubt about (gradation in) the possibility of realization of unintentional awareness, ambiguity in the existence and nature of affections containing knowledge, etc. which are discussed at the end of present paper.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Schleiermacher is the founder of a trend whose members regard mystical experience as a kind of feelings and affections. Of course, he believes that this kind of experience is not devoid of any epistemic aspect and, differentiating between two kinds of feelings and two kinds of awareness, holds that mystical experience is a kind of feelings which has a direct awareness in which the distance between perceiver and perceived is removed. He uses the concept of &quot;absolute dependency&quot; to explain this particular feeling and awareness which form the nature of mystical experience and knowledge. Absolute dependency is a one-directional relationship in which man has no freedom and choice by himself. This feeling includes and explains the concept of God, world and man. Man and world are the absolute dependent and God as the other side of this dependency (Absolute Independent). Several criticisms have directed against this view, including doubt about (gradation in) the possibility of realization of non-conceptual awareness, doubt about (gradation in) the possibility of realization of unintentional awareness, ambiguity in the existence and nature of affections containing knowledge, etc. which are discussed at the end of present paper.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">religious experience</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">mystical knowledge</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">the nature of mystical experience</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Schleiermacher</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_36_d504578ada92b7f3ed6e5d6c47edebcb.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
