University of Qom Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 1735-9791 3 11-12 2002 03 21 The foundations of theism; response to Plantinga The foundations of theism; response to Plantinga 74 110 365 10.22091/pfk.2002.365 FA Hassan Islami Journal Article 2015 08 29 <span class="hps">The first</span> <span class="hps">major criticism</span> <span class="hps">of</span> <span class="hps">epistemology</span> <span class="hps">Plantinga</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">the</span> <span class="hps">Catholic</span> <span class="hps">philosopher</span> <span class="hps">was</span> <span class="hps">Fylypkvyn</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">Plantinga</span> <span class="hps">criticizes</span> <span class="hps">Kevin</span> <span class="hps">replied that</span> <span class="hps">it</span> <span class="hps">was</span> <span class="hps atn">a four-</span><span>issue</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">This paper is</span> <span class="hps">a response</span> <span class="hps">to that</span> <span class="hps">call</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">In this article</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">Kevin</span> <span class="hps">Plantinga</span> <span class="hps">to</span> <span class="hps">each</span> <span class="hps">of the four</span> <span class="hps">issues</span> <span class="hps">raised</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">their opinion</span> <span class="hps">about them</span> <span class="hps">Bazmygvyd</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">Quinn</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">the</span> <span class="hps">four</span> <span class="hps">point</span> <span class="hps">difference</span> <span class="hps">is</span> <span class="hps">he</span> <span class="hps">Plantinga<span class="hps">However</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">he</span> <span class="hps">believes that</span> <span class="hps">an agreement</span> <span class="hps">could be</span> <span class="hps">reached</span> <span class="hps">on the</span> <span class="hps">first</span> <span class="hps">two issues</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">but</span> <span class="hps">in the</span> <span class="hps">next issue</span> <span class="hps">is</span> <span class="hps">so</span> <span class="hps">controversial</span> <span class="hps">that</span> <span class="hps">Plantinga</span> <span class="hps">hope</span> <span class="hps">to</span> <span class="hps">agree on</span> <span class="hps">them.</span> <span class="hps">The</span> <span class="hps">four issues</span> <span class="hps">that</span> <span class="hps">are</span> <span class="hps">yet</span> <span class="hps">four parts</span> <span class="hps">of</span> <span class="hps">the article</span> <span class="hps">are:</span> <span class="hps">1. A</span> <span class="hps">method of</span> <span class="hps">partial</span> <span class="hps">justification</span> <span class="hps">of epistemic</span> <span class="hps">criteria</span><span>;</span> <span class="hps">2.</span> <span class="hps">Classical</span> <span class="hps">Bnyanangary</span> <span class="hps">revised</span><span>;</span> <span class="hps">3.</span> <span class="hps">justify</span> <span class="hps">theistic</span> <span class="hps">beliefs</span><span>;</span> <span class="hps">4.</span> <span class="hps">the</span> <span class="hps">annulment of</span> <span class="hps">theistic</span> <span class="hps">beliefs</span></span> <span class="hps">The first</span> <span class="hps">major criticism</span> <span class="hps">of</span> <span class="hps">epistemology</span> <span class="hps">Plantinga</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">the</span> <span class="hps">Catholic</span> <span class="hps">philosopher</span> <span class="hps">was</span> <span class="hps">Fylypkvyn</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">Plantinga</span> <span class="hps">criticizes</span> <span class="hps">Kevin</span> <span class="hps">replied that</span> <span class="hps">it</span> <span class="hps">was</span> <span class="hps atn">a four-</span><span>issue</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">This paper is</span> <span class="hps">a response</span> <span class="hps">to that</span> <span class="hps">call</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">In this article</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">Kevin</span> <span class="hps">Plantinga</span> <span class="hps">to</span> <span class="hps">each</span> <span class="hps">of the four</span> <span class="hps">issues</span> <span class="hps">raised</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">their opinion</span> <span class="hps">about them</span> <span class="hps">Bazmygvyd</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">Quinn</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">the</span> <span class="hps">four</span> <span class="hps">point</span> <span class="hps">difference</span> <span class="hps">is</span> <span class="hps">he</span> <span class="hps">Plantinga<span class="hps">However</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">he</span> <span class="hps">believes that</span> <span class="hps">an agreement</span> <span class="hps">could be</span> <span class="hps">reached</span> <span class="hps">on the</span> <span class="hps">first</span> <span class="hps">two issues</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">but</span> <span class="hps">in the</span> <span class="hps">next issue</span> <span class="hps">is</span> <span class="hps">so</span> <span class="hps">controversial</span> <span class="hps">that</span> <span class="hps">Plantinga</span> <span class="hps">hope</span> <span class="hps">to</span> <span class="hps">agree on</span> <span class="hps">them.</span> <span class="hps">The</span> <span class="hps">four issues</span> <span class="hps">that</span> <span class="hps">are</span> <span class="hps">yet</span> <span class="hps">four parts</span> <span class="hps">of</span> <span class="hps">the article</span> <span class="hps">are:</span> <span class="hps">1. A</span> <span class="hps">method of</span> <span class="hps">partial</span> <span class="hps">justification</span> <span class="hps">of epistemic</span> <span class="hps">criteria</span><span>;</span> <span class="hps">2.</span> <span class="hps">Classical</span> <span class="hps">Bnyanangary</span> <span class="hps">revised</span><span>;</span> <span class="hps">3.</span> <span class="hps">justify</span> <span class="hps">theistic</span> <span class="hps">beliefs</span><span>;</span> <span class="hps">4.</span> <span class="hps">the</span> <span class="hps">annulment of</span> <span class="hps">theistic</span> <span class="hps">beliefs</span></span> https://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_365_175ba50c513cd0008b54b2ea1b92a161.pdf