University of Qom Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 1735-9791 3 11-12 2002 03 21 Introduction to the methodology of science Introduction to the methodology of science 158 167 368 10.22091/pfk.2002.368 FA Sayyid Ali Haghi Journal Article 2015 08 29 <span class="hps">Muslim</span> <span class="hps">philosophers and</span> <span class="hps">logicians</span> <span class="hps">three types</span> <span class="hps">of deductive reasoning</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">inductive</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">metaphor</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">analogy</span> <span class="hps">Yqynavr</span> <span class="hps">know</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">Induction</span> <span class="hps">also</span> <span class="hps">consider</span> <span class="hps">linking</span> <span class="hps">to</span> <span class="hps">rule</span> <span class="hps">Alatfaqy</span> <span class="hps">Yqynavr</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">But</span> <span class="hps">do not</span> <span class="hps">Yqynavr</span> <span class="hps">analogy</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">although</span> <span class="hps">it</span> <span class="hps">plays</span> <span class="hps">a significant</span> <span class="hps">role</span> <span class="hps">in the Philosophy of</span> <span class="hps">Ghyryqyny</span> <span class="hps">allegory</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">These three</span> <span class="hps">kinds of</span> <span class="hps">argument</span> <span class="hps">in</span> <span class="hps">this</span> <span class="hps">paper</span> <span class="hps">are compared</span> <span class="hps">with</span> <span class="hps">each other</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">the strengths</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">weaknesses of</span> <span class="hps">each</span> <span class="hps">case</span> <span class="hps">is mentioned</span> <span class="hps">Muslim</span> <span class="hps">philosophers and</span> <span class="hps">logicians</span> <span class="hps">three types</span> <span class="hps">of deductive reasoning</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">inductive</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">metaphor</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">analogy</span> <span class="hps">Yqynavr</span> <span class="hps">know</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">Induction</span> <span class="hps">also</span> <span class="hps">consider</span> <span class="hps">linking</span> <span class="hps">to</span> <span class="hps">rule</span> <span class="hps">Alatfaqy</span> <span class="hps">Yqynavr</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">But</span> <span class="hps">do not</span> <span class="hps">Yqynavr</span> <span class="hps">analogy</span><span>,</span> <span class="hps">although</span> <span class="hps">it</span> <span class="hps">plays</span> <span class="hps">a significant</span> <span class="hps">role</span> <span class="hps">in the Philosophy of</span> <span class="hps">Ghyryqyny</span> <span class="hps">allegory</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">These three</span> <span class="hps">kinds of</span> <span class="hps">argument</span> <span class="hps">in</span> <span class="hps">this</span> <span class="hps">paper</span> <span class="hps">are compared</span> <span class="hps">with</span> <span class="hps">each other</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">the strengths</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">weaknesses of</span> <span class="hps">each</span> <span class="hps">case</span> <span class="hps">is mentioned</span> https://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_368_e2f3825eb52d4991f7fefe27e3417563.pdf