University of Qom Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 1735-9791 2 7-8 2001 03 21 Take the issue of introspection and extroversion in contemporary epistemology Take the issue of introspection and extroversion in contemporary epistemology 33 58 436 10.22091/pfk.2001.436 FA Morteza Fathizadeh Journal Article 2015 08 31 <span id="result_box" lang="en"><span class="hps">Controversy over</span> <span class="hps">the nature of knowledge</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">knowledge of</span> <span class="hps">the subject</span> <span class="hps">to determine the</span> <span class="hps">necessary and sufficient conditions</span> <span class="hps">of positive</span> <span class="hps">cases</span> <span class="hps">has led</span> <span class="hps">to</span> <span class="hps">two types of</span> <span class="hps">theorizing</span> <span class="hps">introvert and extrovert</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">Introvert</span> <span class="hps">to</span> <span class="hps">extrovert</span> <span class="hps">Drvnybvdn</span> <span class="hps">theorists</span> <span class="hps">requirements</span> <span class="hps">theorists</span> <span class="hps">insist</span> <span class="hps">on</span> <span class="hps">Byrvnybvdn</span> <span class="hps">it</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">External and internal</span> <span class="hps">ambiguity of the concept</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">how to evaluate the</span> <span class="hps">importance of</span> <span class="hps">internal and external</span> <span class="hps">factors</span> <span class="hps">analysis</span> <span class="hps">introversion</span> <span class="hps">and extraversion</span> <span class="hps">knowledge of</span> <span class="hps">the heart of</span> <span class="hps">the debate</span> <span class="hps">in</span> <span class="hps">the last two decades</span> <span class="hps">the history of</span> <span class="hps">contemporary</span> <span class="hps">epistemology</span><span>.</span><br />  </span>     <span id="result_box" lang="en"><span class="hps">Controversy over</span> <span class="hps">the nature of knowledge</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">knowledge of</span> <span class="hps">the subject</span> <span class="hps">to determine the</span> <span class="hps">necessary and sufficient conditions</span> <span class="hps">of positive</span> <span class="hps">cases</span> <span class="hps">has led</span> <span class="hps">to</span> <span class="hps">two types of</span> <span class="hps">theorizing</span> <span class="hps">introvert and extrovert</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">Introvert</span> <span class="hps">to</span> <span class="hps">extrovert</span> <span class="hps">Drvnybvdn</span> <span class="hps">theorists</span> <span class="hps">requirements</span> <span class="hps">theorists</span> <span class="hps">insist</span> <span class="hps">on</span> <span class="hps">Byrvnybvdn</span> <span class="hps">it</span><span>.</span> <span class="hps">External and internal</span> <span class="hps">ambiguity of the concept</span> <span class="hps">and</span> <span class="hps">how to evaluate the</span> <span class="hps">importance of</span> <span class="hps">internal and external</span> <span class="hps">factors</span> <span class="hps">analysis</span> <span class="hps">introversion</span> <span class="hps">and extraversion</span> <span class="hps">knowledge of</span> <span class="hps">the heart of</span> <span class="hps">the debate</span> <span class="hps">in</span> <span class="hps">the last two decades</span> <span class="hps">the history of</span> <span class="hps">contemporary</span> <span class="hps">epistemology</span><span>.</span><br />  </span>     https://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_436_ac21b28156745d4e508ae45cae568600.pdf