<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه قم</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>پژوهش‌های فلسفی -کلامی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-9791</Issn>
				<Volume>28</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Classification of Challenges and Solutions in Practical Theology: A Three-Level Approach (Meta-theoretical, Theoretical, and Practical)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Classification of Challenges and Solutions in Practical Theology: A Three-Level Approach (Meta-theoretical, Theoretical, and Practical)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>113</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>148</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4394</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/jptr.2026.14073.3401</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>حسین</FirstName>
					<LastName>باقری</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشجوی دکتری فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، گروه فلسفه، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>سحر</FirstName>
					<LastName>کاوندی</LastName>
<Affiliation>استاد فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، گروه فلسفه، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-3936-770X</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>مرتضی</FirstName>
					<LastName>حسین زاده</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، گروه فلسفه، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-9351-6561</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>04</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study systematically classifies the challenges and solutions in practical theology within a three-level framework: meta-theoretical, theoretical, and practical. Despite developments since Schleiermacher, practical theology lacks an integrated framework addressing interconnected challenges across these levels. Using a descriptive-analytical and comparative-critical method, the research examines key definitions and four approaches: pastoral, social studies-based, theory-centered, and reformist. Findings reveal profound transformations: expansion from ecclesial to social contexts, a shift from applicative to critical-reflective methods based on religious praxis, and increased attention to socio-cultural dimensions. The classification shows that meta-theoretical challenges (modernity, hermeneutical crisis) shape foundational presuppositions; theoretical challenges (interaction with human sciences) create methodological tensions needing interdisciplinary solutions; and practical challenges (clergy education, institutional reforms) demand context-sensitive interventions. The study’s main contribution is demonstrating the dialectical interconnection among these levels: revising epistemological presuppositions enables interdisciplinary methodologies, which facilitate practical reforms in clergy education. Solutions include linking religious narratives to contemporary issues, using social sciences to understand social structures, developing effective communication skills, and creatively employing new technologies in religious education. </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This study systematically classifies the challenges and solutions in practical theology within a three-level framework: meta-theoretical, theoretical, and practical. Despite developments since Schleiermacher, practical theology lacks an integrated framework addressing interconnected challenges across these levels. Using a descriptive-analytical and comparative-critical method, the research examines key definitions and four approaches: pastoral, social studies-based, theory-centered, and reformist. Findings reveal profound transformations: expansion from ecclesial to social contexts, a shift from applicative to critical-reflective methods based on religious praxis, and increased attention to socio-cultural dimensions. The classification shows that meta-theoretical challenges (modernity, hermeneutical crisis) shape foundational presuppositions; theoretical challenges (interaction with human sciences) create methodological tensions needing interdisciplinary solutions; and practical challenges (clergy education, institutional reforms) demand context-sensitive interventions. The study’s main contribution is demonstrating the dialectical interconnection among these levels: revising epistemological presuppositions enables interdisciplinary methodologies, which facilitate practical reforms in clergy education. Solutions include linking religious narratives to contemporary issues, using social sciences to understand social structures, developing effective communication skills, and creatively employing new technologies in religious education.&lt;br /&gt;Keywords: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Practical theology</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">religious praxis</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">three-level framework</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">meta-theoretical challenges</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">interdisciplinary methodology. </Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_4394_c7ca2c6e62d6ddae2b67b637e3c2394d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
