Dependency of the Mean Upon the Right Rule; A Critique of the Aristotelian Mean’s Interpretation as an Autonomous Ethical Action’s Criterion

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

PhD. Graduate in philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The mean has mostly been considered in the history of Aristotelian Ethics’ commentaries as the main idea of his ethical thought so that it transformed from an ethical concept to his ethical theory. Thus, the validity of the Aristotelian ethical attitude is evaluated by the mean as the central thesis. However, it becomes apparent by pursuing the procedure of the Aristotelian investigation in the text of the Nicomachean Ethics that the mean is first presented as a possibility for the necessity of the best choice’s understanding in every given practical situation. The final signification and the substantial content of the mean is that the best choice must be chosen by every individual agent at any particular action considering all the multiple, variable and conditioned factors. Because the mean is an individual intuitive grasping, it needs a right rule; relying on which, as a universal criterion, we determine any particular mean in every special circumstance. The right rule itself consists of the right reason. Having surveyed various kinds of knowledge, Aristotle arrives at practical reason, which is an agent’s dispositional power generally and in comprehending and actualizing the best particular option particularly. The mean, therefore, depends on the right rule which itself relies on the correct reason or practical understanding (Phronesis).

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

 
Abū Hayyān al-Tawhīdī. (1988). Al-Baṣā’ir wa al-Dhakhā’ir. Beirut: Dar Al-Sader.
Al Fārābī. (1405AH). Fosol Al Montaze, research by Fawzi Najar. Tehran: Al-Zahra.
Al-Ghazali (Algazelus). (2011). Ihya' Ulum al-Din or Ihya'u Ulumiddin or Iḥiyāʾ ʿulūm ad-dīn (The Revival of Religious Sciences). Beirut: Dar Al Maarifah.
Al-Kindī. (1978). Rasael Al-falsafieh (Philosophical Works). Beirut: Dar Al-fekr Al-Arabi.
Apostle, Hippocrates George. (1980). Nichomachean Ethics, (Translated with Commentaries & Glossary). London: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Aristotle. (1377 AP). Akhlaq Nikomakhusi (Nicomachean Ethics). Translated from Germany to Persian by: Mohammad Hassan Lotfi, Tehran: Tarh-i No.
Aristotle. (1378 SH). Aristotlis Organon Persice (Organon). Translated from Greek to Persian by M. S. Adib-Soltani. Tehran: Negah Press.
Aristotle. (1979). Al-Akhlaq (Nicomachean Ethics). Translated from Greek to Arabic by Isḥāq ibn Ḥunayn. Kuwait: Vekalatol-Matbu'at.
Avicenna (Ibn Sina). (1371 AP). Al-Mubahithat. Introduction and research by Mohsen Bidarfar. Qom: Bidar Publications.
Barnes, J. (1995). Nicomachean Ethics (The Complete Works of Aristotle, The Revised Oxford Translation). Revised by Urmson, J. O. US: Princeton University Press.
Bartlett, R. & Collins S. D. (2011). Nicomachean Ethics (translated with an interpretive essay, notes, and glossary). Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Bekker, I. (1870). Aristotelis Opera. Berlin.
Brown, L. (1997). What is .the mean relative to us in Aristotle’s Ethics? In Phronesis: a journal for ancient philosophy. 1 (42), 77-93.
Burger, R. (2008). Aristotle's Dialogue with Socrates: On the “Nicomachean Ethics”. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Bywater, I. (2010). Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carlo, N. (2010). Etica Nicomachea, (Introduzione, traduzione e note). Roma-bari: Economica Lateraza.
Cornford, F. & Wicksteed, P. H. (1957). The Physics, (The Loeb classical library). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Crisp, R. (2004). Nichomachean Ethics (Translated & Edited). Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Ghazali, A. M. (1995). Mizan al- ‘Amal. Research by Ali Abu Mulhim. Beirut: Dar wa Maktabat al-Hilal.
Ghazali, A. M. (1995). Mizan al-'amal (Criterion of Action). (1995) Research by Abu Molham, Beirut: Dar wa Maktabah al-Hilal.
Gottlieb, P. (2009). The virtue of Aristotle's Ethics, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
Hardie, F. (1968), Aristotle's Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hursthouse, R. (2006). The Central Doctrine of the Mean. In: Richard Kraut (Ed.), BlackWell Guide to Aristotlian Nicomachean Ethics., pp. 96-115 .US: First published in 2006 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Hutchinson. D. S. (1999). Ethics. In: J. Barnes (Ed.), Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Ibn Miskawayh. (1381 AP). Tahzib al-Akhlaq wa Tat-hir al-A ‘raq. Qom: Bidarfar Publications.
Irwin, T. (1999). Nicomachean Ethics. (Second edition). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Irwin, T. (2007). Development of Ethics, a historical and critical study, Volume I: from Socretes to the Reformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Irwin, T. H. (1999). Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks Oxford.
Kant, Metaphysics of Moral, 1991, introductionand Trans. and Notes by M. Gregor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
Kraut, R. (1991). Aristotle on the Human Good. US: Princeton University Press.
Liddell & Scott. (1968). An Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon, founded upon the seventh edition of Liddell & Scott’s Greek-English Lexicon, first edition 1889, Oxford: at the Clarendon Press.
Mazzarelli, C. (2009). Etica Nicomachea, (Introduzione, traduzione, note e apparati). Milano: Bompiani Testi A Fronte.
Pearson, G. (2007). Phronesis as a mean in the Eudemian Ethics. In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol. XXXII, pp. 273 - 295.
Peters, F. E. (1967). Greek Philosophical terms (a Historical Lexicon). US: New York University Press.
Rackham, H. (1950). The Politics, (The Loeb classical library). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rackham, H. (1956). Nicomachean Ethics (Loeb classical Library). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ross, D. (2009). Nicomachean Ethics (revised with an introduction and notes by Lesley Brown). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ross, W. D. (1925). Nicomachean Ethics (The works of Aristotle). The first edition, vol 9. Oxford: The Clarenden Press.
Ross, W. D. (1964). Aristotle. London & New York: Oxford University Press.
Shields, Christopher. (2007). Aristotle. London & New York: Routledge.
Shirazi, S. M. (Mulla Sadrā). (1981). Al-Hikmat al-Muta ‘aliyah fi al-Asfar al-‘Aqliyyat al-Arba‘(The Transcendent Theosophy in the Four Journeys of the Intellect). Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi.
Stewart, J. A. (1999). Notes on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. Virginia: Thoemmes Press. (Reprinted from 1892 edition by Oxford, Clarenden Press).
Tusi, N. D. (1391 AP). Akhlaq-i Naseri (Naseri Ethics). Mojtaba Minui & Alireza Haydari (Eds.). Tehran: Khwarazmi Publications.
Urmson. J. O. (1973). Aristotle's Ethics. US: Wiley & Blackwell.
Williams, B. A. O. (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MassHarvard University Press.
Zeller. E. (1897). Aristotle and the EarlierPeripatetic. Vol 2.  Being A Translation from Zeller’s Philosophy of the Greeks by B. F. C. Costelloe & J. H. Muirhead. London, Longmans.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Journal of Philosophical Theological Research
Volume 21, Issue 4 - Serial Number 82
December 2019
Pages 153-176

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics