A Critical Study of Karl Barth's Opposition to Natural Theology

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD candidate, Philosophy of Religion, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate professor, Philosophy of Religion, University of Tehran. Tehran. Iran

3 Associate professor, Philosophy of Religion, University of Tehran. Tehran .Iran

Abstract

Critical analysis of Karl Barth's opposition to natural theology shows that it is demonstrably based on a narrow understanding of natural theology and is mostly shaped through his reaction to the misuse of theological concepts during the heydays of Hitler's rule over Germany. In his increasing opposition to natural theology in its various implications and forms, Barth seems to have been basing his arguments on ontological, epistemological, biblical and practical grounds as he leaned heavily on revelation as the sole basis of all that pertains to the formation of faith and dogma. By engaging Barth in the aforementioned areas, it will be shown that Barth's arguments fall short of consistency in that they contain false designations of natural theology by focusing on a limited and out-dated version of it, an inherent vicious circularity, a highly selective interpretation of respective biblical texts as well as a fallacy of relevance. It will be argued that the concept of revealed theology is not necessarily opposed to a constructive approach to natural theology, which seeks to appreciate the manifest glory of God in creation as an unfolding secret observed and understood through the rational faculties within the human mind.
 
 

Keywords

References

Ahd-i Jadid bar Asas-i Ketab-i Muqaddas-i Bayt al-Muqaddas (the New Testament according to the Holy Book of Jerusalem). (1393 AP). Trans. by Piruz Sayyar. Tehran: Ney Publications.
Balthasar, H., & Marga, A. (1992). The Theology of Karl Barth. London: T & T Clark International.
Barth, K. (1979). The knowledge of God and the service of God according to the teaching of the Reformation: recalling the Scottish confess. of 1560. New York: AMS Pr.
Barth, K., & Bromiley, G. W. (1975). Church Dogmatics I/1. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Barth, K., & Hoskyns, E. C. (1968). The Epistle to the Romans. London: Oxford University Press.
Barth, K., & Marga, A. (2011). The word of God and theology. London: T & T Clark International.
Barth, K., & Parker T. H. L. (1964). Church Dogmatics II/1. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Bayat, M. R. (2005). The Theology of Karl Barth. The Society for Islamic Studies, 2(1), 45-68.
Bayat, R. (2005). The Theology of Karl Barth. The Society for Islamic Studies, 2 (1), 45-68. Küng, H. (1386 AP). Great Christian Thinkers. Trans. into Persian as: Mutafakkiran- i Buzurg-i Masihi, by a group of translators. Qom: Religions and Denominations Research Center.
Bonaventure, S. (1953). The mind’s road to God (B. George, Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Busch, E., Guder, D. L., Guder, J. J., & Bromiley, G. W. (2004). The great passion: an introduction to Karl Barth's theology. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Calvin, J., & Anderson, J. (1849). Commentary on the Book of Psalms. Grand Rapids MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library.
Éd. du Cerf. (1998). La Bible de Jérusalem. Paris.
Harper Bibles. (2007). Holy Bible: Nrsv, New Revised Standard Version. New York.
Helm, P. (2006). John Calvin's Ideas. New York: Oxford University Press.
Herrmann, W., Micklem, N., & Saunders, K. A. (1927). Systematic theology (Dogmatik). New York: The Macmilan Company.
Johnson, K. (2010). Karl Barth and the Analogia Entis. London: T & T Clark International.
Kant, I., & Carus, P. (2001). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Küng, H. (1386 AP). Great Christian Thinkers. Trans. into Persian as: Mutafakkiran- i Buzurg-i Masihi, by a group of translators. Qom: Religions and Denominations Research Center.
Kung, H. (1996). Große Christliche Denker. München: Piper.
Kung, H. (1996). Große Christliche Denker. München: Piper. Vahdatipoor, M & Haghi, A. (2013). Karl Barth on Neo Orthodoxy Theology. Journal of Religious Thought, 12 (45), 19-38. .
McGrath, A. E. (2004). Dawkin's God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
McGrath, A. E. (2005). Iustitia Dei: A History of the Christian Doctrine of Justification. Cambridge: New York: Cambridge University Press.
McGrath, A. E. (2007). Christian Theology: An Introduction. Chichester: Balckwell Publishing.
McGrath, A. E. (2008). The Open Secret: A New Vision for Natural Theology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
McGrath, A. E. (2014). Emil Brunner - A Reappraisal. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Morgan, D. D. (2010). Karl Barth. London: SPCK.
Padgett, A. G., & Wilkens, S. (2009). Christianity & western thought. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Pr.
Spencer, A. J. (2015). The Analogy of Faith: The Quest for God's Speakability. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.
Vahdatipoor, M & Haghi, A. (2013). Karl Barth on Neo Orthodoxy Theology. Journal of Religious Thought, 12 (45), 19-38
Vahdatipour M., & Haghi S. A. (2012). A Critical Study of Karl Barth's Views on Neo-orthodoxy. Journal of Religious Thought, 12(45), 19-38.
Velde, D. te. (2013). The doctrine of God in reformed orthodoxy, Karl Barth, and the Utrecht school: a study in method and content. Leiden: Brill. Webster, J. (2004). Karl Barth. London: Continuum.
Webster, J. (2004). Karl Barth. London: Continuum.
White, R. M. (2000). Talking about God: the concept of analogy and the problem of religious language. Farnham: Ashgate.
 
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics