The Dilemma of Reincarnation and its Solution in Al-Razi’s Theory of Perfection of the Soul

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. Student of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Muhammad Ibn Zakariya al-Razi, the famous physician and philosopher of the Islamic world, has been considered by many researchers in different aspects. His theory of perfection of the soul, however, is not much appreciated in recent scholarship. Without learning philosophy, he believes the soul cannot be perfected and released from the body after death. This proposition begs the question: What will be the fate of the soul after death if it is not sufficiently perfected? Reincarnation, responds al-Razi. His view on reason and reincarnation sets forth a dilemma in his philosophy. The conception of reincarnation implies two propositions: (1) only human beings are rational, and (2) the transmigrated soul eventually returns to the human body, so that it once again tries to achieve perfection. These propositions raise two questions: Why is the soul rational in the human body and irrational in animals? If rationality is an accident for the souls, how does it survive death? This paper aims to provide a flawless solution for this dilemma through a critical analysis method. Before this, previous attempts for achieving such a solution must be investigated. Therese-Anne Druart has suggested that, for al-Razi, animals have reason to some extent. Therefore, the soul is rational, whether it is a human soul or that of animals. Contrarily, Peter Adamson argues that al-Razi has regarded animals as deprived of reason, although they can think. Providing six arguments, Adamson argues that al-Razi does not believe in reincarnation. This way, there will be no reincarnation in al-Razi's philosophy to lead him to the dilemma. We propose that neither of the above solutions can solve the dilemma of reincarnation because al-Razi believes in both reincarnation and depriving animals completely of reason. He does not regard rationality as a condition for the survival of the soul after death. Al-Razi has been influenced by Plato and also mostly by Galen and is opposed to Aristotle's view on the soul. So, his conception of the soul should be conceived in a Platonic sense, not an Aristotelian one. Accordingly, the soul is an eternal self-mover entity and rationality is not the criterion for the survival of the soul. Besides, al-Razi indicates that a human being's reason is due to the particular temperance and structure of his body, especially the brain. Consequently, the soul does not need rationality to survive death. Moreover, the nature of the soul is not necessarily rational. Although the view of reincarnation faces many problems, as many Muslim philosophers have criticized it, this investigation can pave the way for further research on the nature of the soul from al-Razi’s viewpoint.

Keywords

References

Adamson, p. (2012). Abu Bakr Al-Razi on Animals. Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie, 94(3), 249-273. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2012-0011.
Akbarzadeh, H. & Kazemi, N. (2014). A Criticism on Accusations against Muhammad Ibn Zakariyya Razi Regarding Atheism and Denial of Prophecy. Philosophical Meditations, 4(13), 129-157. [in Persian]
Andalusi, S. D. (1997). Al-Taʿrif bi Tabaqat al-Umam. (G. R. Jamshidnezhad Awwal, Research). Tehran: Hejrat. [in Arabic]
Boustanchi, A. & Dalmaghani, S. (2013). Principles and Elements of Morality in Muhammad Ibn Zakariya Al-Razi’s Thought. The Epistemological Research, 2(6), 41-64. [in Persian]
Druart, T.-A. (1996). Al-Razi’s Conception of the Soul: Psychological Background to His Ethics. Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 5(2), 245-264.
Druart, T.-A. (1997). The Ethics of Al-Razi. Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 6(1), 47-72.
Faramarz Qaramaleki, A. & Mansori, A. A, (2015). A Comparison of Two Types of Autonomous and Revelation-Based Rationalism in Abu Hatam Al-Razi and Muhammad Ibn Zakariyya Al-Razi’s Debate. History of Philosophy, 3(5), 91-110. [in Persian]
Faramarz Qaramaleki, A. (2011). The Theory of a Healthy Man in Razi’s System of Ethics. Religious Anthropology, 7(24), 19-37. [in Persian]
Faramarz Qaramaleki, A. (2012). Nazariye-i Akhlaqi-yi Muhammad b. Zakariyyah Razi [Razi’s Ethical Theory]. Tehran: Iranian Research Institute of Philosophy (IRIP). [in Persian]
Furughi, A. (2005). Sayr-i Hikmat dar Uropa be Zamime-yi Guftar dar Ravish-i Rah Burdan-i ʿAql [the course of philosophy in Europe, including the discussion regarding the method of applying the intellect]. Tehran: Hekmat. [in Persian]
Galenus, A. (Galen). (2008). Kitab-i Jalinus, ila Aghlooqan fi Shifa al-Amrad, Majmuʿ-i Hasht Kitab-i Tibbi [a collection of eight books on medicine by Galen]. (H. b. Ishaq, Trans.). Tehran: Iran University of Medical Sciences Press. [In Arabic]
Ganjvar, M. (2018). Typology of Rationality in Two Philosophers: Confluence of Zakariya Al-Razi’s Autonomous Rationality and Abu Hatam al-Razi’s Revealed Rationality. History of Philosophy (Tārīkh-I Falsafeh), 1(9), 119-152. [in Persian]
Goodman, L. E. (1972). Razi’s Psychology. In History of Philosophy, H. O. Nasr & O Leaman (Eds.), New York: Routledge, 372-404.
Goodman, L. E., (1975). Razi’s Myth of the Fall of the Soul: Its Function in His Philosophy. In Essays in Islamic Philosophy and Science, F. G. Hourani (ed.), Albany: State University of New York Press, 25-4‌0.
Goodman, L. E., (2015). How Epicurean was Rāzī?. Studia graeco-arabica, 5, 247-260.
Hoseini Shahrudi, M. & Rastin, A. (2014). Barrasi-i Durusti-i Intisab-i Tanasukh be Suhrawardi va Zakariyya Razi ba tikye bar Aathar (a study of the truth of ascribing reincarnation to Suhrawardi and Zakariyya Razi based on their works). Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 9(14), 3-21. [in Persian]
Mattila, J. (2017). The Ethical Progression of the Philosopher in Al-Rāzī and Al-Fārābī. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 27(1), 115-137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0957423916000114
Motahhari, M. (1387 AP/2008-9). Khadamat-i Mutaqabel-i Islam va Iran [Islam and Iran: A Historical Study of Mutual Services]. Tehran: Sadra.
Muhaqqeq, M. (1974). Filsoof-i Ray, Muhammad b. Zakariyyah Razi [the philosopher from Rey, Muhammad b. Zakariyya Razi]. Tehran: Islamic Studies Institute, McGill University Press.
Nasir Khusrow. (1923). Zad al-Musafirin [traveling provision of pilgrims]. Tehran: Kaviani.
Nasir Khusrow. (1925). Divan-i Ashʿar [book of poems]. (N. A. Taqavi, Ed.). Tehran: n.p.
Nikseresht, I., Jafarian, R., & Farrahi, A. (2018). Cosmology of Muhammad Ibn Zakariya al-Razi. History of Philosophy (Tārīkh-I Falsafeh), 1(9), 81-102.
Osborne, C. (2007). Dumb Beasts and Dead Philosophers: Humanity and the Humane in Ancient Philosophy and Literature (1st edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Plato. (1977). Dore-yi Athar-i Aflatun [a collection of Plato’s works] (vol. 3). (H. Lutfi, Trans.). Tehran: Khwarazmi. [In Persian]
Razi, A. H. A. (2003). Aʿlaam al-Nubuwwah (the Proofs of Prophecy). Beirut: Dar al-Saqi.
Razi, F. D. (1987). Al-Matalib al-ʿAliya fi al-ʿIIlm al-Ilahi (vol. 7). (A. Hijazi al-Saqa, Research). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Arabi.
Razi, M. (1939). Al-Madkhal ila Sanaʿat al-Tibb [Introduction to the Art of Medicine]. Tehran: Iran University of Medical Sciences Press.
Razi, M. (1939). Rasaʾil Falsafiyya li Abi Bakr Muhammad b. Zakariyya al-Razi [Opera Philosophica]. (P. Kraus, Ed.). Cairo: Bowl Bariba Printing.
Razi, M. (1978). Al-Tibb al-Ruhani [The Spiritual Physik of Rhazes]. (A. L. M. Al-Abd, Ed.). Cairo: Al-Maktabat al-Nehdat al-Misriyya.
Razi, M. (2002). Al-Hawi fil al-Tibb [The Comprehensive Book on Medicine]. (H. Khalifa Tamimi, Ed.). Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi.
Razi, M. (2005). Al-Shukook li al-Razi ʿala Kalam Fadil al-Atibbaʾ Jalinus fi al-Kutub al-lati Nusibat ilehy [The Doubt on Galen in the books attributed to him]. (M. Labib Abdulghani, Research). Cairo: Dar al-Kutub wa al-Wathaiq al-Qowmiyya.
Sorabji, R. (1993). Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. New York: Cornell University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctv1nhkqr
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Journal of Philosophical Theological Research
Volume 22, Issue 2
June 2020
Pages 5-25

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics