Pragmatism is, most importantly, an “approach” that evaluates theories or beliefs in
terms of the success of their practical application. So it emphasizes on resorting to
experience, whether in the sense of ‘process’ or in the sense of “product”. Form this
viewpoint, the concept of experience in James’ pragmatic thought finds a special
significance so that the whole of his thought can be referred to it as well as be
understood upon it. Such a point is also true in regard to his view of ‘religion’.
James seeks to explore religion within human life, actions and experiences, so he
has used the expression “religious experience”. For the sense meant by James has
not stated clearly, the present writing attempts to elucidate it in different relations
and aspects.
کاپلستون، فردریک (1382) تاریخ فلسفه ( جلد هشتم: از بنتام تا راسل ) ترجمه بهاء الدین خرمشاهی؛ تهران: علمی فرهنگی و سروش
لاهوری، اقبال (1379) بازسازی اندیشه دینی در اسلام؛ ترجمه محمد بقایی ماکان؛ تهران: فردوس
ملکیان، مصطفی(1381 ) راهی به رهایی؛ تهران: نگاه معاصر
نقیب زاده، میر عبدالحسین (1383) درآمدی به فلسفه؛ تهران: طهوری
هاسپرس، جان (1379) درآمدی بر تحلیل فلسفی؛ ترجمه موسی اکرمی؛ تهران: طرح نو
Chisholm, Roderick (1992) William James’s theory of truth; Monist.vol.75; issue 4.
Clifford, William Kingdon (1886) The Ethics of Belief; in hisLectures and Essays; edited by: Leslie Stephan & f. Pollok. Macmillan and Co. second edition.
James, William (1897) The will to believe, and other essays in popular philosophy; in his collected Writings 1878-1899. selected by Gerald Myers (1992) New York: The library of America.
James, William (1902)The varieties of religious experience; in his collected Writings 1902-1910. selected by Bruce Kuklick (1987) New York: The library of America.
James, William(1907)Pragmatism;in his collected Writings 1902-1910. selected by Bruce Kuklick (1987) New York: The library of America.
James, William (1909)The meaning of truth;in his collected Writings 1902-1910. selected by Bruce Kuklick (1987) New York: The library of America.
Kant. Immanuel (1887) critique of practical reason and other works of the theory of ethics; translated by: Thomas Kingsmill Abbott. London & New York: Longman, Green & co.
Moore, G.E. (1905) William James Pragmatism; in: Pragmatism. Edited by: Alan Malachowski (2004) London. Sage Publication. Vol. 3
Peirce, Charles S.(1878) How to Make Our Ideas Clear; in: Pragmatism. Edited by: Alan Malachowski (2004) London. Sage Publication. Vol. 1
Peirce, Charles S. (1905) What Pragmatism Is? in: Pragmatism. Edited by: Alan Malachowski (2004) London. Sage Publication. Vol. 1
Robinson, Daniel (2003) How religious experience "works": Jamesian pragmatism and its warrants; The review of metaphysics 56.
14. Ayer, A.j.(1968). The origins of Pragmatism: studies in the philosophy of Peirce and James. San Francisco: Free man, cooper
Bolandhemmatn, K., & Naqibzdeh, M. A. O. (2009). Religious Experience from James’s Standpoint. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 10(3), 223-249. doi: 10.22091/pfk.2009.217
MLA
Keivn Bolandhemmatn; Mir Abd ol-Hosein Naqibzdeh. "Religious Experience from James’s Standpoint". Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 10, 3, 2009, 223-249. doi: 10.22091/pfk.2009.217
HARVARD
Bolandhemmatn, K., Naqibzdeh, M. A. O. (2009). 'Religious Experience from James’s Standpoint', Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 10(3), pp. 223-249. doi: 10.22091/pfk.2009.217
VANCOUVER
Bolandhemmatn, K., Naqibzdeh, M. A. O. Religious Experience from James’s Standpoint. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 2009; 10(3): 223-249. doi: 10.22091/pfk.2009.217
Send comment about this article