The Tension Between Faith and Reason in Islamic Tradition: A Case Study of Imam Muhammad Ghazali

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy of Religion, Research Institute of Philosophical Studies and History of Science, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

While there is no real tension between faith and reason for Muslim scholars, in post-Kantian philosophy of religion there have been serious doubts about the rationality of religious doctrines. It is noteworthy that Ghazali’s critiques of philosophical reasoning are totally different from Kant’s. Ghazali denied the reliability of pure reasoning without the help of faith, while Kant denied the access of reason to the intangible world. By paying attention to Kant’s philosophy for understanding the very difference of the faith/reason tension in Islamic tradition and contemporary philosophy of religion and employing an extra-religious approach and an analytical-critical method, the present research has studied Ghazali’s corpus and concluded what concerned Ghazali was faith, not reason; since he held that only a pious believer could be saved from the hell. He was not concerned about reasoning without revelation and religious belief. Ghazali maintained that philosophical reasoning falls short of the truth of affairs. One could say, from a different point of view, he was aware of the limits of reasoning in the same way as Kant was; but unlike Kant, through faith, he arrived at matters which are far from the access of reason. Finally, although in Kant’s thoughts, faith has lost its rational bases, Ghazali was not in the same situation. He held that mystical, prophetical reasoning, which he called “al-Qalb” (the Heart), could obtain the truth and has no conflict with faith and revelation, and it is just human reasoning that makes judgments that could come in conflict with religious beliefs. Previous research saw Ghazali as fideistic; although thinking of him of rationalist or fideistic, could be easy based on his Ashʿari commitment, but after enough reflection on his works, it turns out to be difficult to do so because one could find both evidence for his rationality or fideism. Regarding his prioritizing faith over reason, there is a lot of textual evidence in his corpus; his tendency toward reason is not very explicit but can be perceived implicitly from his works. Despite his efforts to emphasize revelation and faith, as well as left human reasoning for revelation, what arises afterward, which has a kind of validity even for him, is the same common reason. Ghazali interpreted the prima facie meaning of Quranic verses which are impossible from a rational viewpoint, such as the corporeality of God. There is no middle ground between faith and reason, and yet Ghazali still stands in the very middle; thus, he could not be seen as just fideistic. If he wanted to demarcate what could be interpreted, he would have taken the side of reason. At the same time, comparing his rationality with Descartes’ is a naïve position to hold. Mystic-minded Ghazali did not see the issue of faith and reason like a philosopher and, ultimately, due to his obedience to God, as well as the fact that his main concern is salvation, he prioritized faith over reason. It is not possible to speak of tension or competence for a mystic-minded like him.

Keywords

References

Ayat Hamou, M. (2012). Suʾal al-taʾwil bayn al-Ghazali wa Ibn al-Rushd. Al-Minhaj, 64.
[In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H. (1315-1317 SH). Nasihat al-muluk (Homayi, J., Ed.). University of Tehran Press. [In Persian].
Ghazali, A. H. (1325 SH). Al-munqath min al-dhalal (Kiyayinezhad, Z., Trans.). Jilwey, 15 & 16. [In Persian].
Ghazali, A. H. (1359 SH). Minhaj al-ʿabidin (Shariati, A. Ed., & Sadi Sawi, A. J., Trans). Anjoman Hikmat Press. [In Persian].
Ghazali, A. H. (1364 SH). Mishkat al-anwar (Ayinewand, S., Trans). Amir Kabir Press.
[In Persian].
Ghazali, A. H. (1374 SH). Mizan al-ʿamal (Donya, S., Ed., & Kasmayi, A. A., Trans.). Soroush Publishing. [In Persian].
Ghazali, A. H. (1380 SH). Manuscript of al-Madhnoon Bihi ʿAla Ghayr Ahlihi, In Pourjavadi, N. (Ed.), Maragha selection. Nashr Daneshgahi. [In Persian].
Ghazali, A. H. (1390 SH). Al-mustasfa min ʿilm al-usool (Hammad, A. Z., Ed.). N.p. [In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H. (1394 SH). Makatib-i farsi-yi ghazali (Qorbanian, M., Ed.). Hikmat Pub.
[In Persian].
Ghazali, A. H. (1409a AH). Al-ʿarbaʿein fi usool al-din. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya. [In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H. (1409b AH). Al-iqtisad fi al-iʿtiqad. N.p. [In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H. (1413 AH). Faysal al-tafraqa (Mahmoud, Ed.). N.p. [In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H. (1425 AH). Bidayat al-hidayah. Dar al-Minhaj. [In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H. (1426a AH). Ihya ʿuloom al-din (Book of Qawaʿed al-ʿAqaʾed). Dar Ibn Hazm. [In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H. (1426b AH). Ihya ʿuloom al-din (Book of ʿIlm). Dar Ibn Hazm. [In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H. (1426c AH). Ihya ʿuloom al-din (Book of Tafakkor). Dar Ibn Hazm. [In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H. (1431 AH). Ayyoha al-walad. Dar al-Bashaer al-Islamiyya. [In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H. (1927). Tahafat al-falasafa (Donya, S., Ed.). Beirut: N.p. [In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H. (1964). Fazaya al-batiniyya (Badwi, A., Ed.). Dar al-Kutub al-Islmiyya.
[In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H. (1975). Maʿarij al-quds fi madarij maʿrefat al-nafs. Manshurat Dar al-Afaq
al-Jadidah. [In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H. (2010). Al-jamʿ al-ʿawam ʿan ʿilm al-kalam, In Maktab al-Buhuth wa al-Darasat (Ed.), The Complete Works. Dar al-Fikr. [In Arabic].
Ghazali, A. H.. (2014). Jawaher al-Quran wa durarahu (Shahin, M. A., Ed.). Dar al-Kutub
al-Ilmiyya. [In Arabic].
Javadi, M., & Mahmoudi, M. (1385 SH). Muqayese-yi tatbiqi-yi aqlaniyat-i bavar-hayi dini az didgah-i Gazali va Mulla Sadra. Ayeneh Hikmat, 28, 65-91. [In Persian].
Kadkhodaie, A. (1393 SH). Naqsh-i ʿaql va wahy dar andishe-yi kalami-yi Gazali. Isharat, 2, 85-106. [In Persian].
Kakaie, Q., & Haqiqat, L. (1387 SH). Mahiyat-i iman az didgah-i Muhammad Gazali. Ayeneh Maʿrefat, 14, 143-168. [In Persian].
Kiyani Nezhad, Z. D. (1363 SH). Arzish-i ʿaql az nazar-i Gazali. Maaref, 3, 199-208. [In Persian].
Mahmoud Sobhi, A. (1991). Fi ʿilm al-kalam: Darasuhu falsafiyya li-aaraʾ al-firaq al-islamiyya fi usool al-din, vol. 1. Dar al-Kutub al-Arabiyya. [In Arabic].
Mirabdallahi, B. (2014). Evaluation of rational perception in Ghazali’s perspective. The Epistemological Research, 4(9), 113-140. [In Persian].
Muhammadi, A. (2017). Ibtina-yi iman-i dini bar maʿrefat-i ʿaqli az manzar-i Gazali. Javidan Khirad, 31, 185-204. [In Persian].
Poorsina, Z. (2009). Systematization of the uses of ‘reason’ in al-Ghazali’s works. The Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 11(1), 5-43. doi: 10.22091/PFK.2009.185
[In Persian].
Poursina, A. (2010). Karbord-hayi segane-yi ʿaql dar nazar-i Gazali. Javidan Khirad, 6(11),
67-86. [In Persian].
Vasalou, S. (2008). Moral agents and their deserts: The character of Mu'tazilite ethics. Princeton University Press.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics