One of the arguments of the realists to prove the existence of universals in the external world is “abstract reference”. According to this argument, there are many true sentences in a language which apparently relates to universals. In the realists’ view, truth of these sentences can be explicated only when universals exist in the external world. On the basis of his “degree of language” theory, Carnap has criticized the above-mentioned argument and demonstrated that delusion of the existence of universals has resulted from the confusion in regard to different degrees of language. In his view, those sentences concerning to universals are in fact second-order sentences which assert properties with regard to some first-order sentences. But Carnap’s theory suffers from two main objections: firstly, his theory is not successful in the elimination of reference to universals, because on the basis of his theory, only reference to non-linguistic universals would be eliminated but reference to linguistic universals continue to survive. Secondly, supposing that Carnap’s theory is true, translation of the sentences in question would be extremely difficult and complicate. So Wilfred Sellars attempts to response the two objections, and thus, to present a reformed version of Carnap’s theory. In the present article, the author first explains Carnap’s theory; then, it presents the relevant objections; and finally, it offers Sellars’ reformed version of Carnap’s theory.
Chomsky, N., Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, 1965.
Frege, Gottlob, Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, Halle a. S.: Louis Nebert. Translated as Concept Script, a formal language of pure thought modeled upon that of arithmetic, by S. Bauer Mengelberg in J. vanHeijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967.
Loux, M.J., Metaphysics, A contemporary introduction, 2nd ed., Routledge, New York, 2002.
Loux, M.J., Metaphysics, contemporary readings, Routledge, New York, 2001.
Loux, M.J., Substance and Attribute, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1978.
Carnap, R., The Logical Syntax of Language, NJ: Littlefield, Adams and Co., Patterson, 1959.
Jackson, Frank, "Statements about Universals", Mind 1977 LXXXVI (343):427-429; doi:10.1093/mind/LXXXVI.343.427. Reprinted in Loux 2001.
Moreland, J.P., "Nominalism and Abstract Reference", American Philosophical Quarterly 27, 1990: 325-34.
Peirce, Charles S., Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Hartshorne and Weiss (eds.), Cambridge: HarvardUniversity Press, 1931-58.
Sellars, Wilfrid, "Abstract Entities" in Review of Metaphysics, 16, 1963, 627-671.
Uebel, Thomas, "Vienna Circle", in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (fall 2006 Edition) URL=
Morvarid, H. (2008). Carnap’s and Sellars’ Theories on Universals. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 9(3), 89-105. doi: 10.22091/pfk.2008.260
MLA
Hashem Morvarid. "Carnap’s and Sellars’ Theories on Universals". Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 9, 3, 2008, 89-105. doi: 10.22091/pfk.2008.260
HARVARD
Morvarid, H. (2008). 'Carnap’s and Sellars’ Theories on Universals', Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 9(3), pp. 89-105. doi: 10.22091/pfk.2008.260
VANCOUVER
Morvarid, H. Carnap’s and Sellars’ Theories on Universals. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 2008; 9(3): 89-105. doi: 10.22091/pfk.2008.260
)
Send comment about this article