The Perfect Human Being in Sohrawardi’s Illuminative Thought and Farabi’s Philosophical System: A Comparative Study of the “Qutb” and the “Ideal Ruler”

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Islamic Philosophy, Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Thoughts and theoretical reflections about “governance” in Islamic society, whether theorizing about the desired structure of government or describing the characteristics of an ideal ruler, is one of the most important topics studied in the field of political thought and philosophy in Islam, to which great names such as Farabi, etc. are connected. In this context, this research, through a comparative approach, seeks to examine and analyze the views of Farabi and Sohrawardi about the ideal ruler from the perspective of a judicial approach. Based on such an approach, a philosopher like Farabi considers the different ways of connecting to the active intellect as the separation of the theoretical intellect from matter and the connection to the active intellect, and a divine sage like Sohrawardi also speaks of the separation of the theoretical intellect and the separation of the power of imagination, which is manifested in a prophet. In the eyes of both thinkers, human reason has the ability to overcome material existence. This type of excellence is a condition for achieving complete metaphysical knowledge and theoretical perfection. The ultimate happiness is the achievement of the active intellect. “The Absolute First Leader” and “Quṭb (Imam or pole)” have both achieved this position.
Introduction
The ideal government and ruler, in the system of Islamic philosophy, are based on the approach of philosophers to wisdom and their opinions and ruling foundations. The philosophers’ approach to wisdom and intellect in the system of Islamic philosophy has changed and developed from Farabi to Sohrawardi and later. Based on this change in the method and approach to wisdom of the sages, philosophical issues and topics including the issue of government and the ideal ruler, have also undergone changes and transformations.
Despite the significant evolution of Islamic philosophy in the two Peripatetic and Illuminative systems, it seems that the ideal ruler in Sohrawardi’s philosophy, which he refers to as “the pole/Imam (quṭb),” is compatible with the first leader of al-Farabi’s utopia. The problem of this research is to investigate the characteristic features of “Qutb” and “First Leader/Philosopher” in the Peripatetic and Illuminative systems of philosophy based on Sohrawardi and Farabi’s approach to wisdom and its types.
“Qutb” in Sohrawardi’s thought
In the wisdom of enlightenment, the perfect human being and the “Qutb” to whom the position of caliph belongs, is perfect in intuitive and argumentative wisdom, and in other words, he is both adept in reflection and adept in discussion.
In Sohrawardi’s thought, the rulers must know wisdom as well be practical wayfarers, that is, they must possess a combination of theoretical and practical wisdom. On the one hand, Sohrawardi’s theory is influenced and consistent with Plato’s theory, both of which emphasize the “ruling sage,” and on the other hand, it is influenced by the Iranian tradition and the benefit of the ideal kings from wisdom and intellect, and “Khurra-yi Kiani[1] and the approval of God, which is in the interpretation Religious and close to Sufism and Shiism, it is interpreted as Qutb and divine sage. A Qutb or an Imam is one who is connected with the active intellect, receives grace from the higher realm, and spreads goodness, prosperity, knowledge, justice, and virtue among religions with a divine plan.
“The First Leader” in Farabi’s thought
The First Leader is someone who does not need the guidance of another human being; rather, all sciences and knowledge are obtained by him in esse and he is able to infer appropriate actions and behavior from general reasoning. He can also best guide others to perform these meritorious deeds; the same actions and actions that bring a person to happiness. These abilities are realized in people of great and outstanding nature by connecting to the active intellect. Such a person, in fact, in the eyes of the ancients, is a king and ruler and worthy of revelation. The rule of such a person is the first rule and his leadership is the first leadership, and the rule of others that is through his rule will be the subordinate rule, and people under the rule of this leader and leader are virtuous people, the chosen ones, and the fortunate ones.
Conclusion
In examining and comparing the two viewpoints, it should be said that a philosopher like Farabi considers the different ways of connecting to the active intellect to be the separation of the theoretical intellect from matter and the connection to the active intellect, and a Godly sage like Sohrawardi also speaks of the separation of the theoretical intellect and the power of imagination, which manifests itself in a prophet, where we witness detachment from matter and the ability to remove the soul from the body.
In the eyes of both thinkers, human reason has the ability to overcome material existence. This type of excellence is a condition for achieving complete metaphysical knowledge and theoretical perfection. The ultimate happiness is the achievement of the active intellect.”First Leader”and “Qutb” have both achieved this position. Based on this, the complete transcendence of material existence is possible for certain people.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Aal Yasin, J. (1992). Al-Aʿmaal al-falsafiyyah, vol. 1. Dar al-Manahil. [In Arabic]
Al-Hashim, J. (1968). Al-Farabi. Manshurat al-Maktab al-Tijari li-l Tiba wa al-Tawdih wa
al-Nashr. [In Arabic]
Amin Razavi, M. (1998). Suhravardi va maktab-i Ishraq. (M. D. Kermani, Trans.). Markaz Publications. [In Persian]
Bouhafa, F. (2019). Ethics and fiqh in al-Fārābī’s philosophy. In P. Adamson (Ed.), Philosophy in the Islamic world in context. De Gruyter.
Fakhry. M. (2002). Al-Farabi: founder of Islamic neoplatonism. Oneworld.
Farabi, M. (1938). Risalat fi-l ʿaql. (M. Bowich, Compiler). Dar al-Mashriq. [In Arabic]
Farabi, M. (1969). Al-Huruf. (M. Mahdi, Researchist). Dar al-Mashriq. [In Arabic].
Farabi, M. (1974). Falsafat Aflatun wa ajzaʾuha. In A. R. Badwi (Ed.), Aflatun fi-l Islam. N.P. [In Arabic]
Farabi, M. (2001a). Tahsil al-saʿadah. (A. Bu Mulhim, Foreword & Commentary). Dar wa Maktabat al-Hilal. [In Arabic]
Farabi, M. (2001b). Al-millat wa nusus ukhra. (M. Mahdi, Ed.). Dar al-Mashriq. [In Arabic]
Farabi, M. (2002a). Aaraʾ ahl madinat fadila. (A. Nasri Nadir, Researchist & Foreword). Dar
al-Mashriq. [In Arabic]
Farabi, M. (2002b). Al-Siyasat al-madaniyyah. (A. Bu Mulhim, Foreword & Commentary). Dar wa Maktabat al-Hilal. [In Arabic]
Farabi, M. (2005). Fusul muntaziʿah. (H. Malekshahi, Trans. & Commentary). Suroush.
[In Persian]
Galston, M. (2007). Politics and excellence: the political Philosophy of al-Farabi. (H. Qaderi, Trans.). Buqah Publications. [In Persian]
Germann, N. (2016). Al-Farabi’s philosophy of society and religion. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from:      
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/al-farabi-soc-rel.
Harwi, M. S. (1984). Anwariyyah: tarjume va sharh-i hikmat al-Ishraq-i Sohrawardi.
(H. Ziyaie, Foreword). Amir Kabir Publications. [In Persian]
Husayni, M. H. (2010). Jilve-yi nubuwwat, imamat, va wilayt-i faqih dar ruʾasa-yi madina-yi fazile-yi Farabi. Marifat, 145, 7-53. [In Persian]
Isfandyar, R. A. (2013). Isfandyar, R. A. (2012). Shahab al-Din Suhrawardi's political thought. Transcendent Policy, 1(3), 121-137. [In Persian]
Jaberi, M. A. (2015). Bazkhwani-yi tarikh-i falsafe dar mashreq-i Islami. (I. Baghistani, Trans.). Hermes. [In Persian]
Kamalizadeh, T. (2013). Aristotelian Notion of Intellect from the Viewpoint of Alexander of Aphrodisias and Al-Farabi. Philosophy and Kalam, 45(2), 141-164.   
10.22059/jitp.2013.29433. [In Persian]
Kamalizadeh, T. (2014). Maʿani va karburha-yi ʿaql dar risale-yi fi-l ʿaql-i Farabi. Qabasat, 19(72), 37-60.
Kamalizadeh, T. (2014). Mabani-yi hikmi-yi honar va zibaie az didgah-i Sohrawardi. Farhangistan-i Honar. [In Persian]
Maftuni, N. (2013). Shi’ah Aspects of Farabi’s Philosophy. Andishe-Novin-e-Dini, A Quarterly Research, 9(33),115-126. [In Persian]
Mahdi, M. (1990). Al-Fārābī’s imperfect state. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 110(4).
Mutlak, F. A. (2011). Al-Ishraq al-ilahi fi al-fikr al-Islami. Dar al-Nehdat al-Arabiyyah, Beyt
al-Hikmah. [In Arabic]
Muvahhid, S. (2005). Negahi be sarchashmeha-yi hikmat-i Ishraq va mafhumha-yi bunyadin-i aan. Tahouri Publications. [In Persian]
Nasr, H., & Leaman, O. (2004). History of Islamic Philosophy. (Translated by a group of philosophy professors). Hekmat Publications. [In Persian]
Poorsaleh Amiri, S. M., & Barkhordari, Z. (2023). The truth of the human soul according to Fārābī. Essays in Philosophy and Kalam, 54(2), 185-203.   
10.22067/epk.2023.78541.1168. [In Persian]
Shahrzuri, S. D. M. (1986). Nazhat al-arwah wa rawdat al-afrah (Tarikh al-hukamaʾ). (M. T. Daneshpazhouh & M. Sodar Mowlaie, Compilers). (M. A. Tabrizi, Trans.). Ilmi Farhangi Publications. [In Persian]
Shahrzuri, S. D. M. (2001). Sharh hikmat al-Ishraq. (H. Ziyaie Turbati, Ed., Research, & Foreword). Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Arabic]
Shahrzuri, S. D. M. (2004). Rasaʾil al-shajarat al-ilahiyyah fi ʿulum al-haqaʾiq al-rabbaniyyah. (N. A. Habibi, Ed. & Foreword). Muassasa-yi Pazhouheshi-yi Hikmat va Falsafe.
[In Arabic]
Sohrawardi, S. D. Y. (1993). Ruzi ba jamaʿat-i Sufian. In H. Corbin (Ed.)., Majmuʿa-yi musannifat-i Shakh Ishraq (vol. 3). Muassasa-yi Mutaleat va Tahqiqat-i Farhangi.
[In Persian]
Sohrawardi, S. D. Y. (2009). Majmuʿa-yi musannifat-i Shakh Ishraq (vols. 1-2). (H. Corbin, Ed. & Foreword). Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Sohrawardi, S. D. Y. (2009). Majmuʿa-yi musannifat-i Shakh Ishraq (vol. 4). (N. A. Habibi, Ed. & Foreword). Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Tabatabaie, J. (2015). Tarikh-i tahavvulat-i siyasi-yi Iran. Minu-yi Kherad. [In Persian]
CAPTCHA Image