Ibn Sīnā’s Negation of Apophatic Theology: Bringing an End to Debates

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran,

2 Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Ahl al-Bayt Studies, Faculty of Theology and Ahl-al-Bayt Studies, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Although apophatic theology has attracted considerable scholarly attention, studies remain flawed both in terms of research methodology and fragmented analysis, neglecting in-depth examination of prominent philosophers. This study addresses this gap by exploring Ibn Sīnā’s perspective, a pivotal figure in Islamic philosophy. Exploring existential, cognitive, and linguistic dimensions of his writings, the study elucidates his approach to theology. This study argues that his theological framework remains integrative and harmonizes apophatic (negative) and positive methods, rejecting absolute negation while affirming the relative capacity of human cognition to comprehend the divine. He acknowledges both the transcendence of God and the limitations of the human intellect, integrating knowledge and ontology to demonstrate that a complete understanding of God and His attributes necessitates both negative and affirmative approaches. While recognizing the necessity of apophatic approaches due to the omnipotence of God and the constraints of human cognition, he diverges in his explanations of God and existence, rejecting the idea of attributing qualities of the Divine to His beings, attributing qualities to God, and emphasizing the apophatic discourse in the cognition of God and His attributes comprehensively.

Keywords

References

References
Abasi Hosain Abadi, H. (2016). Rahyaft-i salbi-i sifat-i Khuda az didgah-i Ibn Sina wa Thomas Aquinas. Isra Hikmat, 7(4), 35-54. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23832916.1394.7.4.3.1. [In Persian].
Abasi Hosain Abadi, H. (2018). The relationship between God's negated attributes with His expressibility according to Avicenna and Allamah Helli. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 19(4), 208-227. https://doi.org/10.22091/pfk.2018.502.1229. [In Persian].
Abbasiyan, M. A. (2008). Ruykard-i chand-wajhi wa Quran-meḥvar be ilahiyat-i salbi wa ijaba. Theology Journal, 8(15), 205-226. https://doi.org/10.22034/pke.2021.11428.1510. [In Persian].
Afzali, A. M. (2007). Negative knowledge: The only way available to God's attributes. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 9(1), 23-52. https://doi.org/10.22091/pfk.2007.223. [In Persian].Ali Khani, I. (2013). Ilahiyyat-i salbi: Sayr-i tarikhi va barrasi-yi didgah-ha. Maʿrifat-i Kalama, 2(4), 89-113. https://alefbalib.com/index.aspx?pid=256&PdfID=299971. [In Persian].
Chase, M. (2022). Des quatre questions aristotéliciennes au tawhid: Notes sur les origines de la théologie négative en Islam. In Studia graeco-arabica (pp. 35-51). Pisa University Press. https://hal.science/hal-03905617v1.
Firuzjai, Y. A. K. (2017). Hikmat-i Mashaʾ. Majma-i Aali-yi Hikamt-i Islami. [In Persian].
Gorjian, M. M. & Afsharpour, M. (2018). Aristotelian and Avicennan background of the principles of analogical theology of Thomas Aquinas. History of Philosophy, 9(1), 7-32. https://hop.mullasadra.org/fa/Article/13970910165904. [In Persian].
Ibn Sina (Avicenna). (1991). Al-Mabahith. Bidar. [In Arabic].
Ibn Sina (Avicenna). 2020. Danish nama-yi ʿalai. Samt. [In Persian].
Ibn Sina (Avicenna). (1985). Al-Shifaʾ (al-tabiʿiyyat). Kitabkhane-yi Ayatollah Marashi Najafi. [In Arabic].
Ibn Sina (Avicenna). (1984). Al-Shifaʾ (al-ilahiyyat). Kitabkhane-yi Ayatollah Marashi Najafi. [In Arabic].
Ibn Sina (Avicenna). (2012). Al-Taʿliqat. Iranian Institute of Philosophy. [In Arabic].
Kakai, Q., & Bahrani, A. (2008). Mabani-yi naẓari-yi ilahiyyat-i salbi. Namah-yi Mufid, 68, 123-140. https://philosophy.mofidu.ac.ir/article_240957.html. [In Persian].
Motahhari, M. (1990). Sharḥ-i mabsut-i manzumah, vol. 1. Intesharat-i Hikmat. [In Persian].
Muzaffari, H. . (2018). Naqd wa barrasi-i nazariyyah-yi Ibn Sina, Aquinas, wa Mulla Sadra dar zaban-i din. Maʿrifat-i Kalami, 8(1), 87-98. [In Persian].
Nasr Esfahani, M., Shanazari, J., & Emam Jomeh, S. M. (2019). Avicenna and the logic of religious understanding. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 21(2), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.22091/pfk.2017.1769.1566. [In Persian]
Sabzvari, H. (Mulla Hadi). (2009). Al-Taʿliqat ʿala shawahid al-rububiyyah. Intesharat-i Bustan-i Ketab. [In Arabic].
Shirazi, S. M. (Mulla Sadra). (1981). Al-Shawahid al-rububiyyah. ( J. Ashtiyani). Bustan-i Kitab. [In Arabic].
Tabarai, M., & Abasian Chaleshtari, M. A. (2017). The comparison between Farabi’s concept of the Necessary Being with Plotinus’ One. Philosophy of Religion, 14(3), 545-569. https://doi.org/10.22059/jpht.2017.209199.1005378. [In Persian].
Tavakkoli, G. H. (2007). Negative theology. Philosophy of Religion Research, 5(1), 91-118. https://doi.org/10.30497/prr.2012. [In Persian].
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Journal of Philosophical Theological Research
Volume 27, Issue 3 - Serial Number 105
September 2025
Pages 21-40

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics