A paper that before you attempt to prove the validity of the trial judge's decision. Although in some traditions, the judge denied credit, most jurists in this case on one of the two terms Zyland: 1. judge in the law of God and the rights of people is valid. 2. The judge is valid only on the rights of people not in the law of God. In the meantime, two words: no credit to the judge in the absolute validity of the law of God, is one of the rare statements. Dear author referred to arguments based on the public and the judiciary as well as the special traditions of this, the result is a Shi'a jurists who have absolute proof, that the judge and the human rights rights of Allah, there is no.
)
Send comment about this article