Can Religion be the Basis for Dialogue at the Global Level?

نویسنده

Professor of Philosophy, Rostock University, Germany

چکیده

Point of View

Reinhard Hesse*
Received: 01/05/2019       |       Accepted: 10/07/2019
As human beings do we at all have a common ground for dialogue and mutual understanding? Yes: what we as human beings have in common, is that we can use and understand arguments. In other words: that we are rational beings. 2. Is our capability for argumentation the only ground we have in common as the basis for dialogue and mutual understanding? There is no argumentation against argumentation. Argumentation can´t be transcended. Thus argumentation, more precisely: the capability of argumentation – i.e. reason - is the only ground we have in common as human beings. 3. Does religion play a role in this respect? Isn´t religion superfluous for a rational human being? No, not in the sense Kant has ascribed to it. To know about the boundaries of knowledge (of reason) and to humbly marvel about the miraculous existence of world, life and reason can rightly be seen as the form of religion - as the form of attitude towards the "beyond" - which is adequate (and unavoidable) for a rational being. Religion is the source of truth and ethics if it means: humble acknowledgment of the un-knowable and hence of the fact that in our search for orientation we are relegated to ourselves as fellow human beings, as brothers and sisters.

 


* Prof. Dr. Dr. Reinhard Hesse, Chair of Philosophy and Ethics (retired), University of Education Freiburg, Germany.    ׀    hesse@ph-freiburg.de

🞕 Hesse, R. (2019). Can Religion be the Basis for Dialogue at the Global Level. The Journal of Philosophical-Theological Research, 21(81), 157۔ 162.  doi: 10.22091/jptr.2019.4315.2113.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Can Religion be the Basis for Dialogue at the Global Level?

نویسنده [English]

  • Reinhard Hesse
* Prof. Dr. Dr. Reinhard Hesse, Chair of Philosophy and Ethics (retired), University of Education Freiburg, Germany.
چکیده [English]

Point of View

Reinhard Hesse*
Received: 01/05/2019       |       Accepted: 10/07/2019
As human beings do we at all have a common ground for dialogue and mutual understanding? Yes: what we as human beings have in common, is that we can use and understand arguments. In other words: that we are rational beings. 2. Is our capability for argumentation the only ground we have in common as the basis for dialogue and mutual understanding? There is no argumentation against argumentation. Argumentation can´t be transcended. Thus argumentation, more precisely: the capability of argumentation – i.e. reason - is the only ground we have in common as human beings. 3. Does religion play a role in this respect? Isn´t religion superfluous for a rational human being? No, not in the sense Kant has ascribed to it. To know about the boundaries of knowledge (of reason) and to humbly marvel about the miraculous existence of world, life and reason can rightly be seen as the form of religion - as the form of attitude towards the "beyond" - which is adequate (and unavoidable) for a rational being. Religion is the source of truth and ethics if it means: humble acknowledgment of the un-knowable and hence of the fact that in our search for orientation we are relegated to ourselves as fellow human beings, as brothers and sisters.

 


* Prof. Dr. Dr. Reinhard Hesse, Chair of Philosophy and Ethics (retired), University of Education Freiburg, Germany.    ׀    hesse@ph-freiburg.de

🞕 Hesse, R. (2019). Can Religion be the Basis for Dialogue at the Global Level. The Journal of Philosophical-Theological Research, 21(81), 157۔ 162.  doi: 10.22091/jptr.2019.4315.2113.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • religion
  • Kant
  • human reason
  • dialogue
  • boundaries of reason

مراجع

-  Eckhart, & Quint, J. (1986). Meister Eckharts Predigten (Unveränd. Nachdr. d. 1. Aufl. Stuttgart 1958). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. (Predigten 1–24)
-  Eckhart, & Quint, J. (1987). Die deutschen und lateinischen Werke. [...] Bd. 5: Die deutschen Werke Meister Eckharts Traktate (Unveränd. Nachdr. [der Ausg. Stuttgart 1963]). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
-  Eckhart, & Quint, J. (1988). Meister Eckharts Predigten (Unveränd. Nachdr. [der Ausg. Stuttgart 1971]). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. (Predigten 25–59)
-  Eckhart, & Quint, J. (2000). Die deutschen und lateinischen Werke. 1 Bd. 3: Die deutschen Werke Meister Eckharts Predigten (Unveränd. Nachdr. [der Ausg. Stuttgart 1976]). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. (Predigten 60–86)
-  Eckhart, & Steer, G. (2003). Die deutschen und lateinischen Werke. [...] Bd. 4,1: Die deutschen Werke Meister Eckharts Predigten. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. (Predigten 87–105)
-  Eckhart, Quint, J., Steer, G., Vogl, H., & Eckhart. (1958). Die deutschen Werke. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer. (Predigten 106–117)
-  Heidegger, M. (1998). Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik (6. Aufl). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
-  Heidegger, M. (2006). Sein und Zeit (neunzehnte Auflage, unveränderter Nachdruck der fünfzehnten, an Hand der Gesamtausgabe durchgesehenen Auflage mit den Randbemerkungen aus dem Handexemplar des Autors im Anhang). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
-  Heidegger, M., & Herrmann, F.-W. von. (2004). Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik: Welt - Endlichkeit - Einsamkeit (1.-3. Tsd). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
-  Kant, I. (1934/1960). Religion within the limits of reason alone, (First Edition edition; T. M. Greene & H. H. Hudson, Eds.). The Open court Pub. Co.
-  Kant, I. (1999). By Immanuel Kant - Kant: Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: And Other Writings: 1st (first) Edition (G. D. Giovanni & R. M. Adams, Eds.; A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
-  Kant, I., & Palmquist, S. R. (2009). Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason (W. S. Pluhar, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. With an Introduction by Stephen Palmquist.
-  Pseudo-Dionysius, Luibhéid, C., & Rorem, P. (1987). Pseudo-Dionysius: The complete works. New York: Paulist Press.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار