Nature along Man’s Journey of Return

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسنده

Ph.D. in Islamic Studies, Institute of Islamic Studies, McGill University, CA. (philosopher and a specialist in Islamicate and German philosophy)

چکیده

This paper examines some key aspects of the formal and figurative discourse on ‘nature’ as manifested in the philosophical tradition and with reference to contemporary life. Instead of building a straightforward, self-enclosed argument for the sake of argument, it will demonstrate how someone living today may arrive at certain kinds of judgments in the light both of our collective human inheritance, of which Ḥikma is a major element, and a philosophical reasoning that penetrates into areas of life with which philosophy is not directly or primarily concerned but which are of fundamental importance to all human beings. It begins by sketching a picture of the present historical moment, which many specialists consider a historical anomaly precipitated by the abrupt rise to world domination by a single geographical region. A few basic themes relating to ‘nature’, which by tradition has been approached either figurately or formally, will then be discussed. Their upshot is that for man to live ‘naturally’, he cannot reduce his own nature to that of other animals. Every being has its particular nature. Therefore, the concept of nature cannot be considered only unconditionally or as something common to all animals. Finally, this paper poses two basic questions: Why has our necessary—but equally ‘natural’—separation from the nature of other beings been allowed to go as far as it has? Are we so alone in our modern troubles that we must cast off our human inheritance and pretend to reinvent the universe at every turn?

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Nature along Man’s Journey of Return

نویسنده [English]

  • Anthony Shaker
Ph.D. in Islamic Studies, Institute of Islamic Studies, McGill University, CA. (philosopher and a specialist in Islamicate and German philosophy)
چکیده [English]

This paper examines some key aspects of the formal and figurative discourse on ‘nature’ as manifested in the philosophical tradition and with reference to contemporary life. Instead of building a straightforward, self-enclosed argument for the sake of argument, it will demonstrate how someone living today may arrive at certain kinds of judgments in the light both of our collective human inheritance, of which Ḥikma is a major element, and a philosophical reasoning that penetrates into areas of life with which philosophy is not directly or primarily concerned but which are of fundamental importance to all human beings. It begins by sketching a picture of the present historical moment, which many specialists consider a historical anomaly precipitated by the abrupt rise to world domination by a single geographical region. A few basic themes relating to ‘nature’, which by tradition has been approached either figurately or formally, will then be discussed. Their upshot is that for man to live ‘naturally’, he cannot reduce his own nature to that of other animals. Every being has its particular nature. Therefore, the concept of nature cannot be considered only unconditionally or as something common to all animals. Finally, this paper poses two basic questions: Why has our necessary—but equally ‘natural’—separation from the nature of other beings been allowed to go as far as it has? Are we so alone in our modern troubles that we must cast off our human inheritance and pretend to reinvent the universe at every turn?

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Nature
  • environment
  • climate change
  • Qūnawī
  • Ibn ʿArabī
  • Mullā Ṣadrā
  • ʿAṭṭār
  • wilāya
  • biological clock
  • Islamic philosophy
  • philosophy of nature
  • Prescractics
  • Ibn Zakariyyāʾ al-Rāzī
  • Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī
  • Ghazālī
  • medical tradition
  • Galen
Attar, F. D. (1984). The conference of the birds. Penguin Books.
Baudelaire, C. (1863). Le peintre de la vie moderne. Collection Litteratura.
Chodkiewicz, M. (1986). Le sceau des saints. Prophétie et sainteté dans la doctrine d’Ibn Arabî. Gallimard.
Al-Ghazālī, A. H. (2011). Kitāb al-tawḥīd.’ In Iḥyāʾ al-ʿulūm. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.
Al-Ḥakīm, S. (1981). Muʿjam al-ṣūfiyyah. Al-Ḥikmah fī ḥudūd al-kalimah. D. Nadrah.
Ibn ʿArabī, M. D. (1980). Fuṣūṣ al-ḥikam. Al-Nāshir Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī.
Ibn ʿArabī, M. D. (1968). Al-Futūḥāt al-makkiyya. Dār Ṣādir.
Ibn ʿArabī, M. D. (2006). Kitāb khatm al-wilāya. Al-Madā.
Al-Baghdadi, J. (2007). Tājj al-ʿārifīn. Dār al-Shurūq.
Qūnawī, S. D. (1995). Annäherungen: der mystisch-philosophische Briefwechsel zwischen Sadr ud-Dīn-i Qōnawī und Nasīr ud-Dīn-i Tūsī. Franz Steiner Verlag.
Qūnawī, S. D. (2002). Iʿjāz al-bayān. Introduced and edited by Jalāl al-Dīn al-Ashtiyānī. Qom: Muassasse-ye Bustan-e Kitab-e Qom.
Qūnawī, S. D. (2006). Al-Nafaḥāt al-ilāhiyya. Moula.
Qūnawī, S. D. (2008) Sharḥ al-asmāʾ al-ḥusnā. Dar wa Maktabat al-Hilal.
Al-Rāzī, A. B. (2006). Al-Shukūk ʿalā Jālīnūs. Silsile-ye Intisharat-e Anjuman-e Athar va Mafakhir-e Farhangi.
Al-Rāzī, A. B. (1982). ‘Kitāb al-ṭibb al-ruḥānī.’ In Rasā’il falsafiyya. Dār al-Īfāq al-Jadīda.
Al-Rāzī, F. D. (2000). Al-Tafsīr al-kabīr. Dār al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya.
Al-Rāzī, A. H. (1977). Aʿlām al-nubuwwa. Intishārāt Anjoman Falsafiyy-e Iran.
Rûzbehân. (1991). Le jasmin des fidèles d’amour. Verdier.
Shaker, A. F. (2020a). Interpreting Mullā Ṣadrā on man and the origin of thinking. Synthesis Philosophica, 70(2), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp35212
Shaker, A. F. (2017). Modernity, civilization and the return to history. Vernon Press.
Shaker, A. F. (2018). The paradigmatic significance of perception in Mullā Ṣadrā’s philosophy of being. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 12(24), 115-43.
Shaker, A. F. (2020b). Reintroducing philosophy: Thinking as the gathering of civilization. Vernon Press.
Al-Shīrāzī, S. D. M. (Mullā Ṣadrā). (2011). Al-Ḥikma al-mutaʿāliya fī’l-asfār
al-arbaʿa
. Dar al-Mahajja al-Bayda.
Al-Shīrāzī, S. D. M. (Mullā Ṣadrā). (1976). Al-Mabdaʾ wa’l-maʿād. (J. D. Ashtiyani, Ed.). Imperial Iranian Academy of Philosophy.
Al-Shīrāzī, S. D. M. (Mullā Ṣadrā). (1984). Mafātīḥ al-ghayb. The Islamic Iranian Academy of Philosophy.
Al-Shīrāzī, S. D. M. (Mullā Ṣadrā). (2004). Al-Shawāhid al-rubūbiyya. Bustan-e Kitab Qom.
Yack, B. (1992). The longing for total revolution: Philosophic sources of social discontent from Rousseau to Marx and Nietzsche. The University of California Press.
CAPTCHA Image