Putnam's Meaning-Based Version of Ontological Pluralism

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسنده

Ph.D. in Philosophical Logic, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

چکیده

In the discussion of ontological pluralism, little attention has been paid to Putnam. However, he can be considered one of the leaders of this approach.The following article pursues Putnam's view on ontological pluralism,that is, pursuing the procedure that Putnam gradually moved away from metaphysical realism and eventually became an ontological pluralist.The discussion begins with Quine's ontological ideas and it is discussed how these ideas can be viewed, at least in Putnam's interpretation, as a monistic approach to ontology. Hence, ontological pluralism is, in a way, a rejection of such ideas. Then, I have dealt with Putnam's arguments against metaphysical realism, and of course its inherent monism. I have shown how his arguments presented in this article in opposition to metaphysical realism can be grouped into a single doctrine called semanticism. So this doctrine, and its relation to Putnam's pluralistic approach, is also discussed. To better understand Putnam's version of ontological pluralism, which I have called the Meaning-Based version, two other versions have been introduced: the Sorting Version, attributed to Aristotle, and the Language-Based Version, attributed to Carnap. Then, I listed one by one the differences between Putnam's version and the other two versions, especially Carnap's version. Finally, the basic components of the Meaning-Based version of ontological pluralism are discussed.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Putnam's Meaning-Based Version of Ontological Pluralism

نویسنده [English]

  • Mohammad Hossein Esfandiari
Ph.D. in Philosophical Logic, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]

In the discussion of ontological pluralism, little attention has been paid to Putnam. However, he can be considered one of the leaders of this approach.The following article pursues Putnam's view on ontological pluralism,that is, pursuing the procedure that Putnam gradually moved away from metaphysical realism and eventually became an ontological pluralist.The discussion begins with Quine's ontological ideas and it is discussed how these ideas can be viewed, at least in Putnam's interpretation, as a monistic approach to ontology. Hence, ontological pluralism is, in a way, a rejection of such ideas. Then, I have dealt with Putnam's arguments against metaphysical realism, and of course its inherent monism. I have shown how his arguments presented in this article in opposition to metaphysical realism can be grouped into a single doctrine called semanticism. So this doctrine, and its relation to Putnam's pluralistic approach, is also discussed. To better understand Putnam's version of ontological pluralism, which I have called the Meaning-Based version, two other versions have been introduced: the Sorting Version, attributed to Aristotle, and the Language-Based Version, attributed to Carnap. Then, I listed one by one the differences between Putnam's version and the other two versions, especially Carnap's version. Finally, the basic components of the Meaning-Based version of ontological pluralism are discussed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • ontological pluralism
  • Putnam
  • semanticism
  • conceptual relativity
  • conceptual pluralism

مراجع

Aristotle. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle (two vols.). The Revised Oxford Translation, (J. Barnes, Ed.). Princeton University Press.
Baghramian, M. (2004). Relativism. Routledge
Baghramian, M. (2008). From realism back to realism: Putnam's long journey. Philosophical Topics, 36, 17-35. 
https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics20083612.
Bennett, K. (2009). Composition, colocation, and metaontology. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics: New essays on the foundations of ontology, pp. 38-76. Oxford University Press.
Carnap, R. (1950). Empiricism, semantic and ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4, 20-40. Reprinted with minor changes in R. Carnap. (1956). Meaning and necessity: A study in semantics and modal logic, (pp. 205-221). Enlarged Edition. University of Chicago Press. Page references are to the reprint.
Carnap, R. (1963). Intellectual autobiography. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Rodulf Carnap, (pp. 3-84). Open Court.
Case, J. (1997). On the right idea of a conceptual scheme. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, XXXV, 1-19.
Case, J. (2001). The heart of Putnam's pluralistic realism. Revue internationale de philosophie, 218(4), 417-430.
Chalmers, D. (2009). Ontological anti-realism. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics: New essays on the foundations of ontology, (pp. 77-129). Oxford University Press.
Eklund, M. (2006). Metaontology. Philosophy Compass, 1(3), 317-334.       
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00026.x.
Eklund, M. (2008a). Putnam on ontology. In M. U. R. Monroy, C. C. Silva, & C. M. Vidal (Eds.), Following Putnam’s trail: On realism and other issues, (pp. 203-222). Rodopi.
Eklund, M. (2008b). The picture of reality as an amorphous lump. In T. Sider
et al. (Eds). Contemporary debates in metaphysics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Eklund, M. (2009). Carnap and ontological pluralism. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.). Metametaphysics: New essays on the foundations of ontology, (pp. 13-156). Oxford University Press.
Esfandiari, M. H., Hajhoseini, M., & Hodjati, M. A. (2021). Aristotle on ontological pluralism. The Quarterly Journal of Philosophical Investigation, 15(36), 264-283.          
https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.41741.2666. [In Persian]
Goodman, N., & Quine, W. V. O. (1947). Steps toward a constructive nominalism. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12(4), 105-122.
Goodman, R. B. (2013). Some sources of Putnam’s pluralism. In M. Baghramian (Ed.), Reading Putnam (pp. 205-218). Routledge.
Hirsch, E. (2002). Quantifier variance and realism. Reprinted in E. Hirsch. (2002). Quantifier variance and realism: essays in metaontology. Oxford University Press.
Hirsch, E. (2009). Ontology and alternative languages. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics: New essays on the foundations of ontology (231-259). Oxford University Press.
Lynch, M. (1998). Truth in context: An essay on pluralism and objectivity. MIT Press.
McDaniel, K. (2009). Ways of being. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics: New assays on the foundations of ontology (290-319). Oxford University Press.
McDaniel, K. (2017). The fragmentation of being. Oxford University Press.
Pihlström, S. (2006). Putnam’s conception of ontology. Contemporary Pragmatism, 3, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-90000043
Price, H. (1992). Metaphysical pluralism. The Journal of Philosophy, 89, 387-409.
Putnam, H. (1975a). Philosophical papers, vol. 1: Mathematics, matter and method. Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history. Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. (1983). Philosophical papers, vol. 3: Realism and reason. Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. (1987). The Many faces of realism. Open Court.
Putnam, H. (1990). Realism with a human face. (J. Conant, Ed.). Harvard University Press.
Putnam, H. (1994). Words and life. (J. Conant, Ed.). Harvard University Press.
Putnam, H. (1995). Pragmatism, an open question. Blackwell.
Putnam, H. (1999). The threefold cord: mind, body, and world. Columbia University Press.
Putnam, H. (2001). Reply to Jennifer Case. Revue internationale de philosophie, 218(4), 431-438. https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.218.0431
Putnam, H. (2004a). Ethics without ontology. Harvard University Press.
Putnam, H. (2004b). The content and appeal of 'naturalism'. In M. de Caro & D. Macarthur (Eds.), Naturalism in Question (pp. 59-70 & pp. 286-290). Harvard University Press.
Putnam, H. (2013). From quantum mechanics to ethics and back again. In M. Baghramian (Ed.), Reading Putnam (pp. 19-36). Routledge.
Quine, W. V. O. (1947). On universals. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12(3),
74-84.
Quine, W. V. O. (1948). On what there is. In From a Logical Point of View. (1953). Harper & Row.
Quine, W. V. O. (1953). Mr. Strawson on logical theory. Mind, 62(248), 433-451.
Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Ontological relativity. In Ontological relativity and other essays, (pp. 26-68). Columbia University Press.
Quine, W. V. O., & Carnap, R. (1990). Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine-Carnap correspondence and related work. University of California Press.
Sosa, E. (1993). Putnam's pragmatic realism. Journal of Philosophy, 90, 605-626.
Thomasson, A. (2016). Carnap and the prospects for easy ontology. In S. Blatti & S. Lapointe (Eds.), Ontology after Carnap (pp. 122-144). Oxford University Press.
Turner, J. (2010). Ontological pluralism. Journal of Philosophy, 107(1), 5-34.
Turner, J. (2012). Logic and ontological pluralism. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41, 419-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-010-9167-x/
Turner, J. (2016). Metaontology. In The Oxford handbooks online series.      
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.013.25.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
پژوهش‌های فلسفی -کلامی
دوره 25، شماره 1
فروردین 1402
صفحه 137-158

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار