Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī on “Conception” and “Assent”

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسنده

Professor, Department of Philosophy, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22091/jptr.2024.10094.2973

چکیده

According to the orthodox view in Aristotelian tradition concerning the division of knowledge (ʿilm), some knowledge in the form of conception (taṣawwur) and assent (taṣdīq) is attainable (al-ʿilm al-ḥuṣūlī). The attainable knowledge is divided into primitive and theoretical. Regarding primitive knowledge, concerning “the conception”, knowing the language and noticing the word is enough to understand it without asking anyone,
and concerning “the assent”, the assertion of which its ingredients are already known
is primitive and hence non-acquisitive if the knower immediately and without any investigation finds its truth-value. On the other hand, acquisitive knowledge is the knowledge about which the above conditions are not enough and the thinker should make some effort to obtain it, hence it is theoretical. However, according to Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, a famous Muslim philosopher, logician, and theologian, all “concepts” and all “assents”, are non-acquisitive although they may be divided into primitive and theoretical. His view leads to the conclusion that all sciences are non-acquisitive, that is, mankind does not have the power to acquire them, which is a counterintuitive view. Ṭūsī is the most famous critic of Rāzī. In this paper, first, I have examined Rāzī’s views and arguments and Ṭūsī’s criticisms. Secondly, I have suggested that Rāzī’s view is rooted in his theological viewpoint, which is coherent with Ashʿarite doctrine.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī on the non-acquisitiveness of “Conceptions” and “Assents”

نویسنده [English]

  • Seyyed Mohammad Ali Hodjati
Professor, Department of Philosophy, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

According to the orthodox view in Aristotelian tradition concerning the division of knowledge (ʿilm), some knowledge in the form of conception (taṣawwur) and assent (taṣdīq) is attainable (al-ʿilm al-ḥuṣūlī). The attainable knowledge is divided into primitive and theoretical. Regarding primitive knowledge, concerning “the conception”, knowing the language and noticing the word is enough to understand it without asking anyone and concerning “the assent”, the assertion of which its ingredients are already known is primitive and hence non-acquisitive if the knower immediately without any investigation finds its truth-value. On the other hand, acquisitive knowledge is the knowledge about which the above conditions are not enough and the thinker should make some effort to obtain it, hence it is theoretical. However, according to Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, all “conceptions” and all “assents”, are non-acquisitive although they may be divided into primitive and theoretical. His view leads to the conclusion that all sciences are non-acquisitive. Ṭūsī is the most famous critic of Rāzī. In this paper, first, I have examined Rāzī’s views and arguments and Ṭūsī’s criticisms. Secondly, I have suggested that Rāzī’s view is rooted in his theological viewpoint, which is coherent with Ashʿarite doctrine.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Fak hr al- Rāzī
  • Ṭūsī
  • conception
  • assent
  • non-acquisitive knowledge
  • Ashʻarites

مراجع

Adamson, P. & Benevich, F. (2023). Fakhr al-Din al-Razi. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. (E. Zalta & U. Nodelman, Eds.).
URL: https//plato.stanford.edu/archives/spring2023/entries/al-din-al-razi/
Al-Rasyid, H. H. (2021). Al-Ashy’ariyyah; Theory of al-Kasb and its urgency in work Ppoductivity improvement. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, Volume 660 (Proceedings of 9th Asbam International Conference (Archeology, History & Culture in the Nature of Malay)). 510-516.
Al-Raza, F. D. (n. d.). Muḥaṣṣal afkar al-mutiqaddimin wa al-mutiʼakhirin min
al-ʻaulamaʼ wa al-hukamaʼ wa al-mutikkalimin. (A. R. Sad, Ed. and Intro). Maktabah al-Koliyyat al-Azhariyyah.
Al-Razi, F. D. (2002). Mantiq al-molakhkhaṣ. (A. Faramarz Qaramaleki & A. Aṣgharinezhād, Eds. and annotators). Imam Sadiq University.
Al-Razi, F. D. (n. d.). Al-Tafsir al-kabir (Mafatih al-ghayb).      
https://lib.eshia.ir/41730/24/395
Al-Tusi, N. D. (n. d.). Talkhiṣ al-muaassal, appendix in muhassal afkar
al-mutiqaddimin wa al-mutiʾakhirin min al-͑ulamaʾ wa al-hukamaʾ wa
al-mutikkalimin. ed. & introduction by (A. R. Sad, Ed. and Intro). Maktabah
al-Kolliyyat al-Azhariyyah.
Ceylan. Y. (1980). Theology and tafsir in the major works of Fakhr al-Din al-Razi. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Edingburgh.
Daghim, S. (2001). Mousuʿa-yi musṭalihat al-Imam Fakhr al-Din al-Razi. Maktabah Lebanon Nashirun.
Erkmen, R. (2022). Fakhr al-Din al-Razi: the problem of knowledge and metaphysical skepticism. Ph.D. Dissertation. Indiana University.
Ghadrdan-Gharamaleki, M. H., & Ghadrdan-Gharamaleki, A. (2016). Contemplation on the rational. Evidences of the Theory of Acquisition (Kasb)”. Philosophy of Religion, 13(2), 251-68.
Jacobsen, B. H. N. (2020). Meno’s Paradox and first principles in Fakhr al-Din
al-Razi. Oriens. 48, 320-44.
Khademi, A., & Talegani, S. H. (2013). Effect of philosophical thoughts on Fakhr Razi’s view of Kasb (Acquisition) Theory. Tahqiqāt-e Kalāmi, 1(1), 125-36.
Khazaeli, M. B., Montazer, Q. A., & MirJafari, H. (2012). Comparative study of classification of science from the perspective of Fakhr al-Din Razi and Shams al-Din Amoli. Studies of Islamic History, 13, 37-64.
Mullā Sadrā, (1999). Al-Tanqih fi al-mantiq. (G. Yasipur, Ed.). (A. Faramarz Qaramaleki, Annotations). The Foundation of Sadra Islamic Theosophy.
Plato. (1956). Protagoras and Meni. (W. K. C. Guthrie, Trans.). Penguin Books.
Suarning (2023). The concept of Al-Kasb Theory in Islamic theology: a critical analysis from the Quranic perspective. International Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies, 3(1), 32-6. http://doi.org/10.329996/ijcrs.2023.3.1.4
Tahiri Soltani, F., & Afshar Kermani, A. (2020). Man’s free will from the perspective of Fakhr al-Razi and Mohammad Husayn Tabataba’i. Journal of Imamīyyah Studies, 5(10), 178-197.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
پژوهش‌های فلسفی -کلامی
دوره 26، شماره 3
مهر 1403
صفحه 151-174

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار