نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار، گروه فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه فلسفه و کلام اسلامی دانشگاه مازندران
3 دانشیار گروه فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، دانشکده ادبیات، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Axioms are crucial to epistemic frameworks, as several schools of the history of science have recognized. The current research issue is that in validating axioms, what defects does the intuitive approach entail, and how can the intersubjective approach (based on the ideas of Islamic philosophers) be explained as an alternative and less-known system? The first one is dedicated to clarifying and criticizing what is called the intuitive approach to validating axioms: this approach is attributed to classical philosophers. It consists of assuming that axioms are propositions whose truth is immediately evident upon taking into account the terms they are based on. The second part clarifies the alternative approach, called the intersubjective approach of validating axioms (IAVA): this approach is attributed to a specific Islamic tradition, developed by Avicenna and Mullā Ṣadrā, and consists of assuming that axioms are propositions that cannot be rationally proved, denied, or doubted, without being already assumed. We are presenting the intersubjective approach from a historical point of view.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله