A Critical Evaluation of Schellenberg’s Divine Hiddenness Argument Based on Avicenna’s Ontological and Epistemological Foundations

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Ph.D. of Islamic Studies teaching, University of Islamic Sciences, Qom, Iran

2 Ph.D. of Islamic Studies teaching, Islamic Studies, University of Tehran, Farabi Campus, Qom, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy and Theology, Baqir al-Olum University, Qom, Iran

چکیده

Atheists have long advanced arguments against the existence of God, challenging the claims of theists. Among these, John L. Schellenberg has proposed an argument known as “divine hiddenness,” which has garnered significant attention from philosophers of religion. Therefore, the subject of this paper is to critique and examine this argument based on the ontological foundations of Avicenna, one of the greatest theist philosophers and prominent figures in Islamic philosophy. The methodology of this article is descriptive-analytical, based on an ontological examination of the rational possibility of connection and the occurrence of connection with the transcendent through religious and mystical experiences. Through a careful examination, it will be demonstrated that Avicenna’s ontological foundations not only support the possibility of relational experiences with the divine but also, when considered within the framework of logical argumentation and the epistemological certainty of mutawātirāt (mass-transmitted hadith), establish the reliability and certainty of such transcendent relations. Consequently, the argument from divine hiddenness—and by extension, atheism—is effectively refuted.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Critical Evaluation of Schellenberg’s Divine Hiddenness Argument Based on Avicenna’s Ontological and Epistemological Foundations

نویسندگان [English]

  • Yaser Hashemi 1
  • Ahmad Valiee 2
  • Mohammad Javad Asghari 3
1 Ph.D. of Islamic Studies teaching, University of Islamic Sciences, Qom, Iran
2 Ph.D. of Islamic Studies teaching, Islamic Studies, University of Tehran, Farabi Campus, Qom, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy and Theology, Baqir al-Olum University, Qom, Iran
چکیده [English]

Atheists have long advanced arguments against the existence of God, challenging the claims of theists. Among these, John L. Schellenberg has proposed an argument known as “divine hiddenness,” which has garnered significant attention from philosophers of religion. Therefore, the subject of this paper is to critique and examine this argument based on the ontological foundations of Avicenna, one of the greatest theist philosophers and prominent figures in Islamic philosophy. The methodology of this article is descriptive-analytical, based on an ontological examination of the rational possibility of connection and the occurrence of connection with the transcendent through religious and mystical experiences. Through a careful examination, it will be demonstrated that Avicenna’s ontological foundations not only support the possibility of relational experiences with the divine but also, when considered within the framework of logical argumentation and the epistemological certainty of mutawātirāt (mass-transmitted hadith), establish the reliability and certainty of such transcendent relations. Consequently, the argument from divine hiddenness—and by extension, atheism—is effectively refuted.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • divine hiddenness
  • Schellenberg
  • Avicenna
  • ontology
  • religious experience
  • mystical experience

مراجع

Al-Farabi, M.  (1995). Araʾ ahl al-madinat al-fadilah va  mudaddatıha. Maktabat al-Hılal. [In Arabic].
Al-Farabi, M. (1991). Fusus al-hikmah. (A. Afifi, Ed.). Al-Zahra Publications. [In Arabic].
Alston, W. P. (2014). Religious experience as perception of God. In M. Peterson et al (Eds.), Philosophy of religion: Selected readings (pp.52-58). Oxford University Press
Asadi, B., Rahmati, E., & Abbasi, B. (2020). A study and critique of John Schellenberg’s divine hiddenness argument based on the finiteness of divine active attributes and wisdom. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research. 22(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.22091/jptr.2019.4185.2091. [In Persian].
Avicenna (Ibn Sina). (1904). Tısʿa rasāʾil fı al hikmah va al-ṭabiʿiyyat. Dar al-Arab. [In Arabic].
Avicenna (Ibn Sina). (1979). Rasaʾil. Bidar Publications. [In Arabic].
Avicenna (Ibn Sina). (1984). Al-Shıfaʾ: al-manṭiq. (A. Ahvani, Ed. (vo1s. 1-4)). Maktabat AAyatullah Marashi Najafi. [In Arabic].
Avicenna (Ibn Sina). (1992). Al-Mubahısat. (M. Bidarfar, Ed.). Bidar Publications. [In Arabic].
Avicenna (Ibn Sina). (2000). Al-Nıjat. (M. Danıshpazhuh, Ed.). University of Tehran. [In Arabic].
Avicenna (Ibn Sina). (n.d.). Al-Isharat va al-tanbihat [Remarks and Admonitions]. al-Balaghat Publications. [In Arabic].
Furlong, P., & Marsh, D. (2002). A skin not a sweater: Ontology and epistemology in political science. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker, (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science (pp. 17-41). Palgrave Macmillan.
Geisler, N. L., & Corduan, W. (2003). Philosophy of religion. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Hamlyn, D. W. (1967). History of epistemology. In P. Edwards (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of philosophy (pp. 8-38). Macmillan.
Hossaini, N. (2016). Moser’s criticism of divine hiddenness argument. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research. 17(4). 27-50. https://doi.org/1022091/PFK.2016.621. [In Persian].
Howard-Snyder, D. (1996). The argument from divine hiddenness. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 26(3). 433-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1996.10717461
James, W. (2009). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. The University of Adelaide Library.
Moser, P. K. (2010). The evidence for God: Religious knowledge reexamined. Cambridge University Press.
Murray, M. J., & Rea, M. (2008). An introduction to the philosophy of religion. Cambridge University Press.
Naraqi, A. (2014). Hadith-i hadir va ghayeb: Maqalati dar bab-i ilahiyat-i ghaybat. Negah-i Muaser. [In Persian].
Pakdel, M., & Alizamani, A. (2023). A critique of Schellenberg’s new logical argument from evil. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 25(2). 33-56. https://doi.org/10.22091/jptr.2023.9213.2867. [In Persian]
Poston, T., & Dougherty, T. (2007). Divine hiddenness and nature of belief. Religious Studies, 43(2). 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412507008943.
Schellenberg, J. L. (1993). Divine hiddenness and human reason. Cornell University Press.
Schellenberg, J. L. (2004). Divine hiddenness justifies atheism. In M. L. Peterson & R. J. van Arragon (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of religion. (pp. 30-41). Blackwell Publishing.
Schellenberg, J. L. (2005). The hiddenness argument revisited (I). Religious Studies, 41(2). 201-215.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412505007614.
Schellenberg, J. L. (2010). The hiddenness problem and the problem of evil. Faith and Philosophy, 27(1). 45-60. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil20102713.
Schellenberg, J. L. (2015). The hiddenness argument: Philosophy’s new challenge to belief in God. Oxford University Press.
Schellenberg, J. L. (2016). Divine hiddenness and human philosophy, In A. Green & E. Stump. (Eds.), Hidden divinity and religious belief: New perspectives (pp. 13-32). Cambridge University Press.
Shams, M. (2008). Ashenayi ba maʿrefat shenasi. Tarh-i No. [In Persian].
Shirazi, S. M. (Mulla Sadra). (2004). Al-Asfar al-arbaʿah. (M. Muhammadi &M. Khaminih, Eds. (vols. 1-10)). Muassasa-yi Hikamt-i Islami-yi Sadra. [In Arabic].
Stace, W. T. (1960). Mysticism and philosophy. St. Martin’s Press.
Swinburne, R. (2004). The existence of God. Oxford University Press.
Tusi, N. D. (1996). Al-Isharat va al-tanbihat (vols. 1-3). Al-Balaghat Publications. [In Arabic].
 
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
پژوهش‌های فلسفی -کلامی
دوره 27، شماره 1
فروردین 1404
صفحه 167-186

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار