A Nascent Realist Theory of Laws of Nature Based on the Doctrine of “Motion in Substance” from Late Islamic Philosophy

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 پژوهشکده مطالعات بنیادین علم و فناوری دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 گروه فلسفه علم، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران

10.22091/jptr.2025.12528.3262

چکیده

This paper proposes a distinct realist perspective on the laws of nature, rooted in the tradition of late Islamic philosophy, which may offer a new solution to one of the difficult challenges of Scientific Realism, termed ‘Central Dilemma’ by Mumford. So it begins with a brief introduction to the problem of Scientific Realism concerning the concept of Laws of Nature. Then in the first part, we compare the realist theories of laws of nature developed by Lewis, Armstrong, and Bird, focusing on their account of the three key concepts of causation, necessity, and law. Based on this analysis, the second part formulates a new realist theory, drawing from the doctrine of “Motion in Substance” from Late Islamic Philosophy, Particularly the philosophical thought of Tabatabai. This will be done by extending the idea of motion in substance and examining some of its implications. This new account is, in some respects, similar to Bird’s view, yet in other respects Humean and similar to Lewis’s. By comparing this new approach with the aforementioned three theories, concerning their accounts of causation, necessity, and law in relation to the ‘Central Dilemma’ challenge, we conclude that it could bring a new vision that could potentially resolve this challenge.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Nascent Realist Theory of Laws of Nature Based on the Doctrine of “Motion in Substance” from Late Islamic Philosophy

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masoud Toossi Saeidi 1
  • Seyed Hasan Hosseini 2
1 Institute for Science and Technology Studies, Shahid Beheshti University
2 Department for Philosophy of Science, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

This paper proposes a distinct realist perspective on the laws of nature, rooted in the tradition of late Islamic philosophy, which may offer a new solution to one of the difficult challenges of Scientific Realism, termed ‘Central Dilemma’ by Mumford. So it begins with a brief introduction to the problem of Scientific Realism concerning the concept of Laws of Nature. Then in the first part, we compare the realist theories of laws of nature developed by Lewis, Armstrong, and Bird, focusing on their account of the three key concepts of causation, necessity, and law. Based on this analysis, the second part formulates a new realist theory, drawing from the doctrine of “Motion in Substance” from Late Islamic Philosophy, Particularly the philosophical thought of Tabatabai. This will be done by extending the idea of motion in substance and examining some of its implications. This new account is, in some respects, similar to Bird’s view, yet in other respects Humean and similar to Lewis’s. By comparing this new approach with the aforementioned three theories, concerning their accounts of causation, necessity, and law in relation to the ‘Central Dilemma’ challenge, we conclude that it could bring a new vision that could potentially resolve this challenge.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Laws of Nature
  • Central Dilemma
  • Necessity
  • Causation
  • Motion in Substance
CAPTCHA Image