A Critical Assessment of Positivity Theory of Faith

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دوره دکتری فلسفه دین، دانشگاه تهران، ایران.

2 استاد گروه فلسفۀ دین دانشگاه تهران، ایران.

چکیده

This paper offers a differentiated assessment of two major challenges to positivity theories of faith: the internal critique advanced by Malcolm and Scott against desire-based (DES) accounts, and the external axiological critique concerning the value of God’s existence. I argue that these challenges operate at distinct levels and therefore do not carry equal force. Malcolm and Scott demonstrate that faith can persist in the absence of positive desire, inclination, or favorable evaluation toward its object. Their analyses of crisis, ambivalence, and sustained commitment devoid of a pro-attitude successfully undermine the posited conceptual necessity of desire for faith, exposing the limitations of linguistic and intuitive defenses of DES-positivity. By contrast, axiological anti-theistic arguments which often appeal to personal goods such as privacy or autonomy remain limited in scope. We contend that they are insufficient to outweigh the broad impersonal goods traditionally associated with theism, including cosmic justice, moral grounding, the absence of gratuitous evil, and objective meaning. We argue that such objections do not destabilize the structural core of positivity theory, but they at most render its evaluative dimension context-sensitive. The overall conclusion is therefore differentiated: while DES-positivity fails to be a necessary condition for faith, the axiological critique does not decisively refute the evaluative dimension of positivity theory. As an alternative, we advance the True Grit Theory as a structurally superior alternative. By grounding faith in practical steadfastness, resilience, and coordinated commitment under pressure, True Grit captures the action-guiding nature of faith without treating positive desire as conceptually essential. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Critical Assessment of Positivity Theory of Faith

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahbobeh Pakdel 1
  • Abbas Yazdani 2
1 Ph. D. in Philosophy of Religion, Department of Philosophy of Religion, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 . Professor, Department of Philosophy of Religion, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

This paper offers a differentiated assessment of two major challenges to positivity theories of faith: the internal critique advanced by Malcolm and Scott against desire-based (DES) accounts, and the external axiological critique concerning the value of God’s existence. I argue that these challenges operate at distinct levels and therefore do not carry equal force. Malcolm and Scott demonstrate that faith can persist in the absence of positive desire, inclination, or favorable evaluation toward its object. Their analyses of crisis, ambivalence, and sustained commitment devoid of a pro-attitude successfully undermine the posited conceptual necessity of desire for faith, exposing the limitations of linguistic and intuitive defenses of DES-positivity. By contrast, axiological anti-theistic arguments which often appeal to personal goods such as privacy or autonomy remain limited in scope. We contend that they are insufficient to outweigh the broad impersonal goods traditionally associated with theism, including cosmic justice, moral grounding, the absence of gratuitous evil, and objective meaning. We argue that such objections do not destabilize the structural core of positivity theory, but they at most render its evaluative dimension context-sensitive. The overall conclusion is therefore differentiated: while DES-positivity fails to be a necessary condition for faith, the axiological critique does not decisively refute the evaluative dimension of positivity theory. As an alternative, we advance the True Grit Theory as a structurally superior alternative. By grounding faith in practical steadfastness, resilience, and coordinated commitment under pressure, True Grit captures the action-guiding nature of faith without treating positive desire as conceptually essential. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Faith
  • Positivity Theory
  • True Grit Theory
  • Desire
  • Positive Evaluation
  • Axiolog of Theism

مراجع

References
Alston, W. (1996). Belief, acceptance, and religious faith. In L. P. Pojman (Ed.), Faith, freedom, and rationality (pp. 3–27).
Audi, R. (2011). Rationality and religious commitment. Oxford University Press.
Buchak, L. (2014). Rational faith and justified belief. In T. Dougherty (Ed.), Religious faith and intellectual virtue (pp. 251–270).Oxford University Press.
Howard-Snyder, D. (2013a). Schellenberg on propositional faith. Religious Studies, 49(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412513000061
Howard-Snyder, D. (2013b). Propositional faith: What it is and what it is not. American Philosophical Quarterly, 50(4), 357–372. 
Howard-Snyder, D. (2016). Does faith entail belief? Faith and Philosophy, 33(2), 142–162.
Kahane, G. (2011). Should we want God to exist? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82(3), 674–696.
Kahane, G. (2012). The value question in metaphysics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85(1), 27–55.
Kraay, K. J., & Dragos, C. (2013). On preferring God’s non-existence. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 43(2), 157–178.
Lougheed, K. (2021). Introduction to the axiology of theism: The current debate and future directions. In K. Lougheed (Ed.), Four views on the axiology of theism: What difference does God make? Bloomsbury Academic. (pp. 1-18).
Malcolm, F., & Scott, M. (2021). True grit and the positivity of faith. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 17(1), (A1)5-32
Malcolm, F., & Scott, M. (2022). A philosophy of faith: Belief, truth and varieties of commitment. Routledge.
McKaughan, D. J. (2013). Authentic faith and acknowledged risk: Dissolving the problem of faith and reason. Religious Studies, 49(1), 101–124.
McKaughan, D. J. (2016). Action-centered faith, doubt, and rationality. Journal of Philosophical Research, 41, 71–90.
McKaughan, D. J. (2018). Faith through the dark of night: What perseverance amidst doubt can teach us about the nature and value of religious faith. Faith and Philosophy, 35(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil2018327101
Pakdel, M., & Yazdani, A. (2024). The reasonableness of pragmatic faith in God as a transcendent value for Joshua Golding. Journal of Philosophy of Religion Research, 22(2), 23–42. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.30497/prr.2024.244576.1839
Palmqvist, C. J. (2022). Desiderata for rational, non-doxastic faith. Sophia, 61(3), 499–519.
Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. Oxford University Press.
Pojman, L. (1986). Faith without belief? Faith and Philosophy, 3(2), 157–176.  
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار