Reexamining Ibn Sīnā's Proof of al-Ṣiddīqīn: A Defense of the Avicennian Formulation Against the Critiques of Transcendent Philosophy

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، دانشکده الهیات، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران

2 استاد گروه فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، دانشکده الهیات، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران.

چکیده

The Proof of al-Ṣiddīqīn, the most rigorous argument for God's existence in Islamic philosophy, has been formulated in various ways. After Mullā Ṣadrā, his formulation gained prominence, while Ibn Sīnā's original version faced three main criticisms from Transcendent Philosophy: that it is purely conceptual, that it relies on the refutation of infinite regress, and that it lacks distinction from the argument from essential possibility. This article reexamines Ibn Sīnā's formulation and defends its originality and sufficiency against these critiques. Through an analytical study of his primary texts, the article demonstrates that the charge of conceptuality arises from preconceptions about Ibn Sīnā's philosophy rather than a neutral reading of his work; that the proof does not depend on refuting infinite regress; and that it is an argument from existential poverty fundamentally distinct from essential possibility. The study further shows that Ibn Sīnā's proof satisfies all four criteria of the Proof of al-Ṣiddīqīn: proceeding within the reality of existence, using self-evident premises, establishing the divine attributes, and requiring no appeal to divine acts. The article concludes that Ibn Sīnā's formulation does not fundamentally differ from Mullā Ṣadrā's and should be regarded as an authentic precursor to the proof in the fifth century AH.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Peripatetic philosophy, Transcendent Philosophy, essential possibility, ontological poverty, God, Necessary Being, contingent being, infinite regress.

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Shafiei 1
  • Mohammad Zabihi 2
1 PhD student, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Philosophy and Islamic Theology, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
چکیده [English]

The Proof of al-Ṣiddīqīn, the most rigorous argument for God's existence in Islamic philosophy, has been formulated in various ways. After Mullā Ṣadrā, his formulation gained prominence, while Ibn Sīnā's original version faced three main criticisms from Transcendent Philosophy: that it is purely conceptual, that it relies on the refutation of infinite regress, and that it lacks distinction from the argument from essential possibility. This article reexamines Ibn Sīnā's formulation and defends its originality and sufficiency against these critiques. Through an analytical study of his primary texts, the article demonstrates that the charge of conceptuality arises from preconceptions about Ibn Sīnā's philosophy rather than a neutral reading of his work; that the proof does not depend on refuting infinite regress; and that it is an argument from existential poverty fundamentally distinct from essential possibility. The study further shows that Ibn Sīnā's proof satisfies all four criteria of the Proof of al-Ṣiddīqīn: proceeding within the reality of existence, using self-evident premises, establishing the divine attributes, and requiring no appeal to divine acts. The article concludes that Ibn Sīnā's formulation does not fundamentally differ from Mullā Ṣadrā's and should be regarded as an authentic precursor to the proof in the fifth century AH.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Peripatetic philosophy
  • Transcendent Philosophy
  • essential possibility
  • ontological poverty
  • God
  • Necessary Being
  • contingent being
  • infinite regress

مراجع

References 
Aquinas, T. (1977). The Summa Theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). Burns Oates & Washbourne.
Badawi, A. al-R. (2008). Mawsūʿat al-falsafah. Dhawi al-Qurbā.
Burik, S. (2010), Self and Other: Continental and Classical Chinese Thought. Philosophy Compass, 5: 735-744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00323.x
Copleston, F. (1991). Tārīkh-i falsafah (B. al-D. Khurramshāhī, Trans.). Surūsh.
Ghazzālī, M. b. M., & Dunyā, S. (1994). Tahāfut al-falāsifah (ʿA. Bū Mulḥam, Ed.). Dār Maktabat al-Hilāl.
Ḥillī, Ḥ. b. Y., & Ṭūsī, M. b. M. (n.d.). Kashf al-murād fī sharḥ Tajrīd al-iʿtiqād. Manshūrāt al-Maktabat al-Muṣṭafawī.
Husainzadeh, M. (1996). Burhān-i imkān dar ilāhiyyāt-i Islāmī. Maʿrifat, (16), 34–51.
Ibn al-ʿArabī, M. b. ʿA., & ʿAfīfī, A. al-ʿA. (1987). Fuṣūṣ al-ḥikam. al-Zahrāʾ.
Ibn Sīnā, Ḥ. b. ʿA. (1984). Al-Mabdaʾ wa al-maʿād (A. Nūrānī, Ed.). Muʾassasah Mutālaʿāt Islāmī Dānishgāh Tehrān –McGill University.
Ibn Sīnā, Ḥ. b. ʿA. (2000). Al-Taʿlīqāt (ʿA. al-R. Badawī, Ed.). Markaz Intishārāt Daftar Tablīghāt Islāmī Ḥawzah ʿIlmīyah Qum.
Ibn Sīnā, Ḥ. b. ʿA., Ṭūsī, N. al-D., & Rāzī, Q. al-D. (1983). Al-Ishārāt wa al-tanbīhāt maʿa al-sharḥ li al-muḥaqqiq al-Ṭūsī wa sharḥ al-sharḥ li al-ʿallāmah Quṭb al-Dīn al-Rāzī. Daftar Nashr al-Kitāb.
Ījī, ʿA. al-D. (n.d.). Sharḥ al-mawāqif. Manshūrāt al-Sharīf al-Raḍī.
Javādī Āmulī, ʿA. (2009). Tabyīn barāhīn ithbāt-i Khudā (5th ed.). Asrāʾ.
Leibniz, G. W. (1996). Faylasūfān-i Inglīsī (A. Jalāl al-Dīn Aʿlam, Trans.; Vol. 5). Surūsh.
Muṭahharī, M. (2023). Tawḥīd. Ṣadrā.
Pearce, Kenneth L., 'Foundational Grounding and the Argument from Contingency', in Jonathan L. Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Vol. 8, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion (Oxford, 2017; online edn, Oxford Academic, 21 Sept. 2017), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198806967.003.0011, accessed 7 June 2026.
Qurashī, ʿA. A. (1992). Qāmūs-i Qurʾān. Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyyah.
Rāzī, Q. al-D. (1987). Al-Maṭālib al-ʿāliyah (A. Ḥijāzī al-Saqqā, Ed.). Dār al-Kutub al-ʿArabī.
Sabzevārī, H. b. M. (1990). Sharḥ al-manẓūmah (Ḥ. Ḥasanʹzādah Āmulī, Commentator; M. Ṭālibī, Ed.; Vol. 3). Nashr-i Nāb.
Sabzevārī, H. b. M. (n.d.). Sharḥ-i manẓūmah-yi ḥikmat. Maktabat al-Muṣṭafawī.
Ṣadr al-Dīn Shīrāzī, M. b. I. (Mullā Ṣadrā). (1981). Al-Ḥikmat al-mutaʿāliyah fī al-asfār al-ʿaqliyyah al-arbaʿah (3rd ed.). Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī.
Ṣadr al-Dīn Shīrāzī, M. b. I. (Mullā Ṣadrā). (1982). Al-Shawāhid al-rubūbiyyah fī al-manāhij al-sulūkiyyah (H. b. M. Sabzevārī, Annotator; J. al-Dīn Āshtiyānī, Compiler). Markaz Nashr Dānishgāhī.
Sayūrī, J. al-Dīn Miqdād b. ʿA. (2001). Al-Lawāmiʿ al-ilāhiyyah fī al-mabāḥith al-kalāmiyyah (M. ʿA. Qāḍī Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Ed.). Markaz Intishārāt Daftar Tablīghāt Islāmī.
Suhrawardī, S. al-Dīn Y. (1993). Majmūʿah-yi muṣannafāt-i Shaykh-i Ishrāq (H. Corbin, Ed.). Muʾassasah Muṭālaʿāt va Taḥqīqāt Farhangī.
Suhrawardī, S. al-Dīn Y., & Rāzī, Q. al-D. (n.d.). Sharḥ Ḥikmat al-ishrāq. Bījā.
Zabīḥī, M. (2010). Falsafah-yi mashshāʾ bā takiyah bar ahamm-i ārā-yi Ibn Sīnā (4th ed.). Sāzmān-i Muṭālaʿah va Tadwīn-i Kutub-i ʿUlūm-i Insānī Dānishgāhhā (SAMT).
 
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار