نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشآموخته دکتری فلسفه و حکمت اسلامی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
2 گروه فلسفه و حکمت اسلامی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد. ایران
3 گروه فلسفه دانشگاه بینالمللی امام خمینی، قزوین، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The problem of " Demandingness of Morality" delineates the boundary between personal interests and moral obligations. It is structured around three key components: inclusiveness, intensity, and priority, giving rise to maximalist, minimalist, and moderate approaches. This paper focuses on inclusiveness, within which two crucial distinctions are made: doing versus allowing harm, and intentional versus unintentional acts. The jurisprudential-ethical rule of "assisting in sin" (iʿāna ʿalā al-ithm) offers a powerful framework for analyzing these distinctions and clarifying the scope of inclusiveness. This rule addresses an individual's participation in and responsibility for the wrongful acts of others, asserting that moral responsibility is not limited to one's own direct actions but extends to the actions of others. Applying this rule to the component of inclusiveness shows that it supports a moderate approach: it accepts social responsibility while avoiding the trap of excessive moral demands. Thus, the rule of assisting in sin reinforces the moderate stance in determining the Demandingness of Morality.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله