نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
1 استادیار گروه ادیان و عرفان، دانشکدهٔ الاهیات و معارف اسلامی دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان
2 دانشجوی رشته فلسفه و کلام دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان
عنوان مقاله [English]
Hedonism as an idea is a theory, according to which happiness is ultimate good and unhappiness is the ultimate evil. Materialist schools of thought, which generally believe in hedonism, have various expressions in different human cultures. Hindu culture is no exception, because there is a distinctive school of philosophy in this culture, called Charvaka, which considers pleasure as the only meaning and aim of life, due to having materialistic school of thought. Epicurean philosophy in Greece is the closest school to Charvaka. These two philosophies formed schools with a hedonistic nature, which could attract many people over centuries in spite of their many enemies and great oppositions. A comparative study of hedonism in these two philosophies through available library resources shows that both of them believe man should be happy and enjoy life completely, because they apparently believe only in the validity and existence of material world, explain man's existence on the basis of his material dimension, and reject any kind of existence afterlife. There are, however, some differences between these two philosophies. Epicureans are completely different with a particular sect of Charvakans in terms of their view about the meaning and kinds of pleasure. Furthermore, Epicureans regard higher happiness and pleasure more as the absence of pain, unlike the followers of Charvaka who regard physical pleasures as the only valid ones. The main aim of Charvakans is to deepen and extend the scope of pleasure, whereas Epicureans seek to reduce the pain as much as possible.
25. Acharya, Madhava (1882). The sarva- Darsana- Samgraha, London: Trubner & co, Ludgate Hill.
26. Audi, Robert (1995). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Bhattacharya, Haridas (1953). The Cultural Heritage of India, Calcutta.
28. Bhattacharya, Ramkrishna (2013). "Development of Materialism In India: The Pre- Carvakas & The Carvakas", in: Esercizi Filosofici, 8: 1-12.
29. Carr, Brian; Mahalingam, Indira (2005). Companion Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy, London & New York: Routlege.
30. Damodaran, K. (1967). Indian Thought: A Ciritical Survey, New York, Asia pub.House.
31. Dasgupta, Surendranath (1952). A History of Indian Philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. ــــــــــــــــ (1922). A History of Indian philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Dawning, Christine (1987-1995)."Hellenistic Religions" in: Encyclopedia of Religion, Mircea Eliade (ed.), vol. 6, pp. 252-365.
34. Horsley, M. (2013). "Carvaka & Epicurus", Society of Friends of Epicurus Journal, 4: 1-3.
35. Johnson, Dominic (2012). Religion, Brain & Behavior, Scotland, Routledge, vol. 2, no. 1, 48-49.
36. Kannengiesser, Charles (1987-1995)."Atheism" in: Encyclopedia of Religion, Mircea Eliade (ed.), vol. 1, pp.480-490
37. King, Richard (2000). Indian Philosophy: An introduction to Hindu & Buddhist Thought, New Delhi: Edinburgh University Press.
38. Krishnananda, Swamit (1994). A Short History of Religious & Philosophical Thought in India, available at: www.Swamit-Krishnananda.org
39. Kumar Sen, Ashoka (ed.) (2014). Journal of Adivasi & Indegnous Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1.
40. Mckenzie, John (1922). Hindu Ethics, Bombay: Wilson College.
41. Mcmullin, Ernan (1954). "Materialism" in: Encyclopedia of Religion, Lindasay Jones (ed.), vol. 9, Lindsay.
42. Moen, Ole Martin (2012). Because it feels good: A Hedonistic Theory of Intrinsic Value, Norway: University of Oslo.
43. Muller, Max (1919). The Six System of Indian Philosophy, London: Longmans Green And Co
44. Raju, P. T. (2009). The Philosophical Traditions of India, London: Routlege.
45. Scharfstein, Ben-Ami (1998). A Comparative History of World Philosophy: from the Upanishads to Kant, The State University of New York Press.
46. Vihari Joshi, Rasik (1987). "Lokayata in Ancient India & China", Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Vol. 68, 1/4: 393-405.
47. Weijers, Daniel Michael (2012). Hedonism & Happiness in Theory & Practice, Victoria University of Wellington.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله