The Meaning of Life in Heidegger’s Philosophical Pedagogy

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Associate Professor of Philosophy, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. in Philosophy of Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده

In this article, we inquire into the concept of meaning in pedagogy through Heidegger’s philosophy. Since metaphysical systems reduce the Being of humans, due to the dominance of subjectivist and worldlessness views, they tend to suffer from the crisis of nihilism, which has made its way into various ontological sciences, especially pedagogy. In this article, we tackle the elements that culminated in such meaninglessness in pedagogy in terms of dualism, worldlessness, absence of existentials, and finally the posteriority of Eros and Pathos to Logos. Now, since the philosophies of Nietzsche and Heidegger extensively deal with the issue of meaning, and in particular, Heidegger in Being and Time grapples with the concept of the meaning of Being by analyzing existentials, here we decided to discuss meaning by drawing on the existentials of understanding and attunement, and from this perspective, we look for a way out of the crisis of nihilism in pedagogy. Discussion of the meaning of being-in-the-world and the prior precedence of Eros over cognition and Logos is also helpful for overcoming the crisis
of nihilism in pedagogy. That is, if pathos, eros, and the existentials of understanding and attunement are taken seriously in pedagogy, then pedagogical meaninglessness might be resisted by appealing to worldlessness and subjectivism. In fact, the revolution that sparked in Heidegger’s philosophy, in which pathos was deemed prior to logos and the question of meaning was rendered possible by turning to existentials, opened the way for a pedagogy based on existentials.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Meaning of Life in Heidegger’s Philosophical Pedagogy

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ahmadali Heydari 1
  • Felora Askarizadeh 2
1 Associate Professor of Philosophy, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. in Philosophy of Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

In this article, we inquire into the concept of meaning in pedagogy through Heidegger’s philosophy. Since metaphysical systems reduce the Being of humans, due to the dominance of subjectivist and worldlessness views, they tend to suffer from the crisis of nihilism, which has made its way into various ontological sciences, especially pedagogy. In this article, we tackle the elements that culminated in such meaninglessness in pedagogy in terms of dualism, worldlessness, absence of existentials, and finally the posteriority of Eros and Pathos to Logos. Now, since the philosophies of Nietzsche and Heidegger extensively deal with the issue of meaning, and in particular, Heidegger in Being and Time grapples with the concept of the meaning of Being by analyzing existentials, here we decided to discuss meaning by drawing on the existentials of understanding and attunement, and from this perspective, we look for a way out of the crisis of nihilism in pedagogy. Discussion of the meaning of being-in-the-world and the prior precedence of Eros over cognition and Logos is also helpful for overcoming the crisis
of nihilism in pedagogy. That is, if pathos, eros, and the existentials of understanding and attunement are taken seriously in pedagogy, then pedagogical meaninglessness might be resisted by appealing to worldlessness and subjectivism. In fact, the revolution that sparked in Heidegger’s philosophy, in which pathos was deemed prior to logos and the question of meaning was rendered possible by turning to existentials, opened the way for a pedagogy based on existentials.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Existentials
  • Attunement
  • Understanding
  • Meaning of Being
  • Pedagogy
Blok, V. (2015). Heidegger and Derrida on the nature of questioning: towards the rehabilitation of questioning in contemporary philosophy. The Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 46(4), 307-322.
Brinkmann, M. (Hrsg.). (2019). Phänomenologische Erziehungswissenschaft von ihren Anfängen bis heute. Springer.
Danner, H. (1984). Lebenswelt ist aller Pädagogik Anfang. Bildung und Erziehung, 37, 179-188.
Descartes, R. (2008). Meditations on first philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Ghoreyshi Khorasgani S. J., & Karbasizadeh, A. (2021). A Heideggerian approach to the embodied cognition and problem of constitution in the cognitive science. Journal of Philosophical Investigations (JPI), 15(37), 352-374.
https://doi.org/10.22034/JPIUT.2021.44940.2774.
Heidegger, M. (1989). Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time. State University of New York Press.
Heidegger, M. (1996). Einleitung in die philosophie. Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (1999). Ontology: the hermeneutics of facticity. Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2000). Reden und andere Zeugnisse eines Lebensweges. Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (2002). Sein und Zeit. Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Heidegger, M. (2015). Schwarze Hefte. Klostermann.
Heydari, A. A., & Hatmian, A. (2020). The nature and role of question in Heidegger’s early thought. Knowledge, 82(1), 134-119.
Hodge, S. (2015). Martin Heidegger: challenge to education. Springer.
Luckner, A. (1997). Martin Heidegger: “Sein und Zeitˮ, ein einführender Kommentar. UTB für Wissenschaft.
Nietzsche, F. (1989). On the genealogy of morals. Vintage.
Nietzsche, F. (2019). From the period of thus spoke Zarathustra. Stanford University Press.
Oele, M. (2012). Heidegger’s reading of Aristotle’s concept of pathos. Epoche, 16(2), 389-406. https://doi.org/10.5840/epoche201216213
Ritter, J. (1971-2007). Historisches worterbuch der philosophie. Schwabe verlag.
Spengler, O. (1991). The decline of the west. Oxford University Press.
Taghi, S. (2017). Typology and classification of three literary genres. Mehevista.
Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber: essays in sociology. Oxford UP.
CAPTCHA Image